HTC One V review: Chin up
Samsung Galaxy S II ICS review: Sugar coatedLG KP500 Cookie - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.9
- Features
-
7.6
- Performance
-
7.6
- Robert Smith
- Report
- 0
I may get this phone. Its priced in the UK for 99.95GBP at the Carphone Warehouse , does not state any network however. Never used an LG before. I am currently using a nokia 6600. I use the opera mini browse for the internet and MIG 33 for msn would these work on this phone, (do they work in other LGs) They are Java based. I also used to use Java based Sat Nav programs (I have it on my PC, (I have an external sat NAV)
- Reply
- 2008-10-30 22:47
- nFE1
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
no Wifi
no flash
no autofocus?
lousy battery
slow CPU??????
- think twice before you pay 250USD for this!
- Reply
- 2008-10-26 07:19
- mstL
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Does it have wifi if it deosn't it suck you should get the lg incite it has wifi and it cost $200 but the coockie is $230 so if your going to get a phone like this you should get the lg incite
- Reply
- 2008-10-19 23:38
- jjsh
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
i like it and cant wait till it comes out
also someone tell me y Velocity Mobile is not on the company section
- Reply
- 2008-10-19 15:33
- 43ni
- C
- iZrod
- Report
- 0
There is a new promo video for this phone:
http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=Gj8khAlg7Iw
If only it had WiFi...
- Reply
- 2008-10-19 04:28
- mwg%
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-10-18 16:06 from up7Z - click to readThis phone is not meant to compare with phones of a completely different price class, the phones starting price quoted by GSM arena is 170euros which is just over $230 american id guess. Thats very cheap for a touch screen phone. If you want a phone to compare to the N-Series compare it to something like the LG Renoir.
- Reply
- 2008-10-18 19:02
- 5%rp
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Well done LG but this cant compete wid nokia's extremely famous N-series.n-series are da best & durable phones in da wrld.sorry of u LG.
- Reply
- 2008-10-18 16:06
- up7Z
- U
- Leo
- Report
- 0
Wow! Amazing price and brilliant features! I will get it as soon as it's available! Can not wait!
- Reply
- 2008-10-18 00:49
- uA0A
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Not bad, but for an entry level touchphone, the Touch Viva is better...
- Reply
- 2008-10-17 23:44
- G2GS
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Im not digging the 3 hours of talk time though. Other than that its really a nice phone.
- Reply
- 2008-10-17 19:20
- qI@q
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
The phone is awesome! It´s a mid range phone and affordable. Comparing to LG Renoir is quite diferent. Renoir has 8MP, GPS, WIFI but the price is much higher. KP500 has the stylus included which is pretty cool. I would recomend this phone who likes touch phones.
- Reply
- 2008-10-15 16:00
- MZb%
- C
- Junior
- Report
- 0
Can't waite for this phone, just how soon will it be available to the US.
- Reply
- 2008-10-13 04:17
- Q{kk
- U
- Dave
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-10-09 13:34 from Sc{8 - click to readThis phone is sooooo hot yaaa! It make me all wet;)
- Reply
- 2008-10-12 16:57
- Tr8a
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to jjj @ 2008-10-01 19:28 from wucQ - click to readYes but LG will relase Renoir where u have 3g and other good things there are different classes
- Reply
- 2008-10-09 13:34
- Sc{8
- R
- Power2B
- Report
- 0
First of all this phone is a classic from LG. Don't laugh on it because it doesnt got a 5 MP camera or Wi-Fi. This phone was made to spread the touch-screen-revolution to people with a cheaper price. If you want a better phone then go for LG Renoir.
- Reply
- 2008-10-07 22:54
- pu4b
- U
- Benny
- Report
- 0
I've had 2 LGs and they all have poor quality. Prefer Nokia or SE.
- Reply
- 2008-10-07 19:55
- mv84
- U
- lg new
- Report
- 0
you have apoint there.
that been said,
1-as far as the three arte versions maybe it is just a matter of taste i prefer the carbon
2-saying that this should have the best camera mem.... yeah it would have been nice if the phone carl ziess lenses 30fps vid recording etc.but hey it dosen't
3-weight i never read that they said this phone is made out of carbon and titanium "post a link of that please" i always knew it is just a cover
finally if you can afford this phone you can afford any other hightech phone
to all you readers this is not ment to be a supper phone its more of just a looker
- Reply
- 2008-10-07 19:14
- MJTC
- U
- esf
- Report
- 0
dont get me wrong i do like the look of this phone and money is no object to me i can afford any phone out there but this time i think nokia are taking the micky this time it should say coated in carbon and a little bit of titanium but still then it should not be 150 g should it like i said its been looked into now and when i pull my arte out of my pocket i dont think look at me i own 1 because i like it thats all and would buy this phone carbon i feally do like the look of it but been told to hang on by the people who i complained to for some reason i think the price will drop soon once nokia have to reprint about what this product is actually made of its not what they say in there press they are making out its totaly carbon and titanium but this is not true , im not against people in this forum im on your side but this time feel so strongly about being mislead by nokia thats why ive complained to the people who regulate phone makers and they do say i have a strong case so think im right this time after all we in this firum like the 8800 phones but we should get what we pay for like we used to , and i strongly believe it should have the best on the inside to , aswell as on the outside like they nokia claim this time its an extra 500 pounds for the outer case and a little bit more memory this is a fact this time , if this phone does not sell well you can bet they soon launch another with better camera better stand by time and so on the person at nokia in charge of the 8800 phones should be sacked he is after more sales not less thats why when sales soon start to fall he gives the go ahead for a better speck . when the first 8800 phones came out they did not launch another for a good few years thats when they where quality and advanced they sold well but this time its more money than quality like i said they are in trouble this time in there press saying what its made of they are hinting its totaly carbon and titanium they seem to have forgot to print its 80 percent steel so they deserve what they get really hope then we all get the 8800 we deserve even if it was a thousand pound dearer we deserve this if you like me have all bought the entire 800 range since they where launched .
- Reply
- 2008-10-07 19:12
- MJTC
- U
