Samsung A657 - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Check Price

Popularity

Daily interest
  N/A
Total hits:
85830

Voting results

Design
7.3
Features
7.3
Performance
7.6
Votes:
143


Sort by:

Thick and big, but it's a cell phone that i need. camera is useless for me.

  • Reply
  • 2010-03-31 05:14
  • 9xj1
  • U

not very impressed with phone reception and is not really user friendly not to mention hardly any cool fetchers have to reset the clock and date manually after battery removal

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-01 06:57
  • QIuR
  • U

> In reply to shannon @ 2009-11-19 12:39 from kLC1 - click to readyeh its got a camre

  • Reply
  • 2010-01-29 05:17
  • i2qK
  • R

I am not satisfied with the battery performance of this set

  • Reply
  • 2009-11-22 12:25
  • vQfV
  • U

> In reply to Ghazall_Ampang @ 2009-04-10 18:17 from tVs5 - click to readDoes this thing have a camera or not ? Some reviews say that it has a 3.0 megapixal camera, and some say that it has GPS instead. WTF ?

  • Reply
  • 2009-11-19 12:39
  • kLC1
  • Q

my step-dad has tis phone and he really likes it he is a truckdriver and his boss got it for himmm....... (: hheeee also has a i-phone which is far better but he likes tis one betta ,. LOL x
i'm in year seven and supposed to be in claaasss butt anii whayys zachariii (:

  • Reply
  • 2009-11-16 04:57
  • 9EwH
  • F

i think this phone is suited for persons who like adventures! :)

  • Reply
  • 2009-11-02 17:42
  • vaQF
  • U

Good Design n' Good perfomance

Kapan dirilis di Indonesia?

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-24 05:37
  • uC15
  • U

it is very beautiful and reliable handset . it is very strong and has good features also!

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-26 09:31
  • 2Tt}
  • C

i hope it will sell in my country, i'm looking for this kind of phone.

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-06 15:16
  • tDAy
  • U

this is the mans world!!!watch out fancy world,here comes a657...

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-05 02:05
  • nUkQ
  • U

is the bound 2700 better? i think it has more....... then this model

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-18 19:16
  • M35R
  • Q

Maybe its because only for 3G standby+talk time. Probably GSM only should last twice the time of 3G.

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-15 12:25
  • Ttsx
  • U

just wondering how the stand by time and talk time is very low for such high cap battery. Kindly recheck the specs. I'm very interested with this model but the talk and standby time are the dealbreaker.

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-05 15:46
  • PBrn
  • C

> In reply to Lindi @ 2009-04-13 20:02 from 04Td - click to readTeenagers....

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-23 07:58
  • PbYy
  • R

it's look to me like siemens old phone M75. looks like the designer are spresading the "siemens" fad,

look at the new Moto phone, some uses the same UI like the last x65 and x75

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-20 08:22
  • wc1E
  • U

How does ATT Navigator works without GPS or A-GPS on this phone? Service tower locator is not accurate, not even close to be acceptable.

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-15 06:31
  • jZIf
  • U

> In reply to Lindi @ 2009-04-13 20:02 from 04Td - click to readYou are a dumbsh!t. Its not supposed to have fancy features, its for construction workers you dumbF!ck.

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-15 05:45
  • Uipf
  • R

These phone i think is for persons who need it. The workers and army. I hade one previous model and i think is perfect phone "extreme" conditions

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-14 09:39
  • mc9y
  • U

What the hack is this? Each company produces touch screen phones with WLAN, 5mpx camera and above and now the latest "surprise" from Samsung is this phone? I hope they are kidding. I won't give more than $30 for this "piece of work", but anyway I will not buy it certainly.

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-13 20:02
  • 04Td
  • C

Sort by:
Total of 27 user reviews and opinions for Samsung A657.