Siemens SL75 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Voting results
- Design
-
8.3
- Features
-
8.0
- Performance
-
8.0
- Votes:
- 1954
- Hits:
- 347979
- billy
- Report
those dummies at siemens/benQ need to make a quad-band slider
- Reply
- 2005-08-25 08:54
- RmQH
- U
- Dambi
- Report
There are not infra red port and card slot in this phone. But I think 52 MB internal memory will be enough.
- Reply
- 2005-08-15 22:48
- SnLA
- U
- jorj jackson
- Report
Hi I read some where this phone has a R-S-MMC card slot???????
- Reply
- 2005-08-15 15:49
- mg}x
- U
- Orange
- Report
Nice Design! But why there are no card slot and infrared port? Will the battery compatable with S65/CX65? I am interesting to the new Siemens OS. Hope the good things in last generation OS will be kept.
- Reply
- 2005-08-12 07:43
- P$qr
- U
- ary surya
- Report
Hei! in one of tabloid in my country it says that SL 75 has a memory card slot and now you said in the specs that SL 75 hasn't got memory card slot?
- Reply
- 2005-08-11 17:25
- PA7e
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
According to a mobile phone magazine, Siemens is joining venture with BenQ. Siemens give the right to BenQ to produce mobile phones for Siemens starting from the 1st of October, for a period of 18 months.
They are keepig the Siemens name/logo on the mobile phone products, but actually they are called BenQ-Siemens.
- Reply
- 2005-08-06 10:26
- P%G5
- U
- ajmak
- Report
Gentlemen!!!!!!!!
This a fashion mobile, not business or entertainment device
Just look fabulous touch and finish from siemens you won’t find it in others
There is S75 & SXG75 will fill all your needs.
.
- Reply
- 2005-08-04 19:28
- MsNF
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Huge phone ! Why so wide & thick ? !!!
Samsung D600 is better in all areas !!!
- Reply
- 2005-08-03 19:31
- P%EH
- U
- Phil
- Report
Why r Siemens all of a sudden making such huge phones?!!! SL55 was so tiny, then sl65 was huge and ugly, and now this!! with a little bit more effort, they coulda made this such a great phone.
- Reply
- 2005-07-30 01:19
- Sn@T
- U
- SL 55
- Report
Nothing about this phone can compare to the Samsung D600. This phone has inferior features. This phone is also wider, thicker, lower resolution, NO card slot etc. etc...
The look is at the most...Average !
- Reply
- 2005-07-23 19:39
- P%EH
- U
- zeeshan
- Report
keypad design is not very good.. ugly .. like snake skin.. :(
- Reply
- 2005-07-20 16:28
- mcMR
- U
- u
- Report
To be honest. If this phone comes out in september with Samsung D600.
Would this phone even have a second thought? The spec of the Samsung D600 is alot better plus the fact, Samsung D600 would appeal more with the previous success of the D500.
- Reply
- 2005-07-19 16:20
- IgM3
- U
- shane
- Report
it is a good phone receptions ok. Camera makes a very stupid lound click that cannot be quieted makeing the camera useless at anywere quiet.
- Reply
- 2005-07-13 16:59
- 4ue5
- U
- MAC
- Report
the phone looks great i will surely have it since i had SL55 and SL65 also. but there are some little bugs like no Irda and no slot card and little dsiplay resolution(D600 has 240x320). anyway...i thought it will smaller but from description results it is even bigger than SL65.
- Reply
- 2005-07-13 09:27
- xn3$
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
what concerns me more is that it does not have the 850 band.
- Reply
- 2005-07-12 21:02
- j23h
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed