Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.5
- Features
-
6.0
- Performance
-
6.1
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-01-06 15:06 from iba5 - click to readwell whats nokia's excuse then???SE brought out the g900 over 6mths ago! cant even keep up with a failing mobile company right???
- Reply
- 2009-01-06 15:09
- U2AI
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
far too large for a pretty basic candy bar form mobile..
come on nokia!
- Reply
- 2009-01-06 15:07
- U2AI
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-01-06 12:57 from PWAj - click to readUIQ already bankrupt
those SOON EXPIRE fans donno what is shame lol
still think g900 is god, UIQ already bankrupt n SOON EXPIRE already drop it OFFICIALLY
- Reply
- 2009-01-06 15:06
- iba5
- R
- Lucas
- Report
- 0
Cute Phone, in all aspects he is very good.. but it don't have HSPD =[ well... expensive, ya?
- Reply
- 2009-01-06 13:46
- P2dw
- U
- mmh
- Report
- 0
lol, No offense, okay. Our needs are different and so are the phones. I think this is not a bad phone at all but must sell at a lower price to survive in these days. (wow, that's the stylus!?!?!) ha ha ha
- Reply
- 2009-01-06 13:23
- uNVx
- U
- avinash
- Report
- 0
its a nice phone from nokia.hope it will continue the success of nokia.
- Reply
- 2009-01-06 12:47
- v{RS
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Very interesting little handset. This should do really well in the lower-end price bracket, a touch screen is just the gimmick that cheap Nokias need to help sell them by the truckload.
- Reply
- 2009-01-06 12:31
- tZqw
- U
- ah kam
- Report
- 0
walao eh~ superb touch screen phone.. loved to get one.
- Reply
- 2009-01-06 10:39
- ibX%
- U
- CeQPoNg
- Report
- 0
Very good design but some times also very funny desgin.
Is it for China market as display language at the picture?
- Reply
- 2009-01-06 10:39
- ibdZ
- U
- anonymouse
- Report
- 0
> In reply to fonedude @ 2009-01-06 08:37 from j5WS - click to readthis phone doesn't look so bad. But i'm not interested. Off topic; A smart car is definitely more fuel efficient than an S class or SL 65. It's more frugal than all the other gasoline fuelled mercedes.
- Reply
- 2009-01-06 10:38
- upH2
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to jet @ 2009-01-06 07:25 from ji{R - click to readthis is a feature phone, not Symbian based...and Nokia already stated that they are not interested in adopting the Android OS in their phones...
- Reply
- 2009-01-06 10:32
- vxpE
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
an odd design for a Nokia phone...judging from the pics I think this is primarily for China...probably won't be available outside of Asia...
- Reply
- 2009-01-06 10:30
- vxpE
- U
- bedan
- Report
- 0
looks so cool.. but features sucks!!! no 3G??? damn nokia.. c'mon boy!!!
- Reply
- 2009-01-06 10:29
- PxBc
- U

