News - Reader comments

Nokia suing Apple over the infringment of a dozen of patents

22 October, 2009 | Read the news | Post your comment
Nokia suing Apple over the infringment of a dozen of patents - read the full textNokia have obviously had some grudges with Apple ever since the iPhone was introduced in 2007 and now they're even going to court. The reason - well, Apple have used some of Nokia's GSM, UMTS and WLAN patented technologies in all of the three generations of the iPhone, but they seem to be refusing...

 

Sort by:

Nokia go go go, sue apple and get some cash like AMD. lol

  • Reply
  • 2009-11-15 11:51
  • TKjF

If Nokia wins the lawsuit, I will most probably never touch a Nokia handset again

  • Reply
  • 2009-11-08 18:58
  • uH%S

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-27 19:51 from MB1U - click to readTake a basic lesson in law kid. A settlement means there is no trial which means there is no 'Guilty' or 'Not guilty'.... because they settled instead of battling it out.
Get it?
Good.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-28 05:23
  • ijDg

> In reply to [deleted post]The reason i asked is because i cant find a quote that says Nokia was found guilty from the whole Nokia Qualcomm saga. I know there was a settlement however there is no explanation as to why there was. It says the payment was so they share patents.
Sorry if i was unclear but i need a link that says nokia found guilty.
You cant blame me for needing proof

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-27 19:51
  • MB1U

I dont know what the rest of you think, i reckon you are all nuts. I tend to leave Apple and Nokia alone and go with my trusty Samsung smartphone.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-27 05:31
  • Fv4G

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-25 22:46 from P%nm - click to readcould you please give me the link to "Nokia was found guilty of stealing Qualcomm's technology and had to pay $1.7 billion, so you can say they stole it."
I'd like to read up on that.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-27 00:16
  • MB1U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-26 23:04 from myre - click to readHey check this out:-

"For some Nokia phones you can configure the use of this codec:
To activate EFR codec use enter the following code: *3370#
To deactivate EFR codec use enter the following code: #3370#"

EFR is one of the disputed patents, it looks like a phone will still work without using it so it's not essential.

Does disabling the EFR codec disconnect you from the network?

Somehow I don't think so.

Are there alternatives?

I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-26 23:59
  • va9k

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-26 14:42 from P%nm - click to readits not about software learn to read, its about hardware standards and protocol, n00b

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-26 23:04
  • myre

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-26 20:57 from P%nm - click to readAre you sure cause apple loves to lie,cheat and steal
And they talk to much
5 years ahead of the mobile market my foot
When steve jobs is cured of cancer and walt disney is revived then i'll believe apple,but until then nope i will never believe or trust apple

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-26 23:00
  • kJqf

Yeah, cut 'em off, nokia.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-26 22:51
  • tWih

Geez, iPhone fans cry more then a homo which is boyfriend stole his handbag...

Get it real guys, even if you like your lack of good software and incomplete hardware cellphone which therefore the trademark didn't payed the pattents, it's just one amough all the others that have to pay those that are enforced by law.

Nokia did good to sue Apple, as it was theyr only way to show the world as non trustworthy is that company.

If i would be in the place of Nokia, i would just love to see all the iPhone stock already on Market to have his GSM transmitions cutted off. That would make me even more realized and rofling at the situation then getting a couple bucks more in my pocket.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-26 21:18
  • ix9y

> In reply to Deep space bar @ 2009-10-26 16:07 from kJqf - click to readB is the second letter of the alphabet, B is for BILLION, M is the thirteenth letter of the alphabet M is for MILLION, nub.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-26 20:57
  • P%nm

nokia are such sore losers

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-26 19:48
  • 4WLn

Good chance apple will take a beating on this one.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-26 18:47
  • Y2K}

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-26 07:42 from R5tn - click to readso true playing around with my friends 3gs and it froze.... iphone suck azz

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-26 16:18
  • 0gGJ

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-26 11:13 from P%nm - click to read34 million wont cover a 200 million dollar law suite nub

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-26 16:07
  • kJqf

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-26 13:38 from ibbB - click to readUnder what terms did these forty companies pay up?

Apple paid Ericsson and Qualcomm for licences, so maybe they didn't use any of Nokia's technology.

Qualcomm is the company Nokia stole code off, Nokia was found guilty and paid Qualcomm $1.7billion.

Apple employed Qualcomm engineers so maybe they came up with their own solutions using the code Nokia stole.

Apple was writing software when Nokia was still pulping forests for paper, they've done a lot of work on data transmission and audio codecs.

We'll just have to wait and see.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-26 14:42
  • P%nm

other 40 company did pay Nokia license

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-26 13:38
  • ibbB

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-26 07:42 from R5tn - click to readAre you serious? Either you have actually never got one or you don't know how to use it because it has never "blacked out" to the point where is needs to be replaced.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-26 13:23
  • vCCs

> In reply to [deleted post]Apple has $34 Billion in cash reserves, the don't have any debt, they could easily pay Nokia licence fees, just like they paid Ericsson and Qualcomm.

Why they didn't pay Nokia is anyone's guess, maybe Nokia got too greedy or maybe Apple isn't using Nokia's technology.

Anyway Apple is making no comment as usual, we won't know anything until it goes to court.

Here's the complaint, it's pretty boring legal stuff

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2145...le-Complaint

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-26 11:13
  • P%nm

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.