Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.6
- Features
-
7.5
- Performance
-
7.5
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Man the metalic pink finished of with the piano black looks mad, and i'm a guy lol
- Reply
- 2009-11-25 09:34
- 0rmL
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Looks Good...but i'm concerned with the battery back-up... and the slider's life.
- Reply
- 2009-11-25 08:48
- 95xp
- U
- gerzblue
- Report
- 0
> In reply to lover of this phone @ 2009-11-25 01:39 from FMYk - click to readi want the blue one.
- Reply
- 2009-11-25 05:32
- wYJ@
- R
- That's it!
- Report
- 0
at 52cc, it's the most compact smartphone from Nokia ever, beating the former champion E52/E55/5630XM by only 2cc. it's also the first S60 smartphone from Nokia to feature Bluetooth 2.1+EDR. The first non-S40 Nokia mobile device to have Bluetooth 2.1+EDR is the N900 which is of course not S60-based. it's also the lowest priced (introductory price) mobile device with 5Mpx camera from Nokia to date and one of the least expensive S60 smartphones from Nokia.
- Reply
- 2009-11-25 04:30
- n5Ps
- U
- eric
- Report
- 0
This is a basic affordable phone and you can't expect to have complete specs. I believe it acts more like a secondary phone or free phone from company or something.
I really like the design and might consider getting 1 as a secondary phone. Reminds me more on my previous 6500 slide design.
- Reply
- 2009-11-25 03:07
- Mfxa
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
That this phone is without wi-fi reminds us how much the folks at Nokia have lost the plot. Sad.
- Reply
- 2009-11-25 02:27
- UGrx
- U
- khalid
- Report
- 0
this phone looks great but the only thing is why does it not have W-lane nokia should have every new phone with W-lane
- Reply
- 2009-11-25 00:31
- je2X
- Q
- bioloid
- Report
- 0
if there were mobiles in 70s this would be the look of them. nokiaaaa! r u kidding...ur designs sucks...
- Reply
- 2009-11-24 22:24
- npqM
- U
- Nick
- Report
- 0
This must be the successor to the 6500 slide which did quite well in Europe. This phone really has a lot crammed into it. If i am not mistaken its cpu is also 600mhz?
- Reply
- 2009-11-24 22:22
- jmVC
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-11-24 14:16 from PZta - click to readThis is an s60 phone so its far better then 6600i
- Reply
- 2009-11-24 21:35
- 3WLC
- R
- Vic
- Report
- 0
I can't believe: S60 smartphone has no Wi-Fi, no 3.5 mm. Besides that it's too thick (16 mm) and equipped with mediocre battery (860 mAh).
- Reply
- 2009-11-24 20:30
- T4Aw
- C
- Anemone
- Report
- 0
nice phone, i'm empressed now with nokia when it comes to producing cheap high quality phones, and it seems that they have changed the way they design their phones(aesthetically) as well. i'm a sony ericsson fan, but this one's great. good job nokia! keep it up!
- Reply
- 2009-11-24 18:18
- P@d$
- C
- Andy Burgin
- Report
- 0
looks a very good mobile indeed,an in different colours,2010 will be a very important time at Nokia,as in 2009 seem to be losing ground with the others,Orange will not like it though no chance of putting there symbel on the Front Fascia,why have Nokia followed suit by putting a 2.5mm headphone jack on this mobile as Ericsson did this with the Satio,as they must know,not any mp3 players out there with the 2.5mm jack nowdays,
- Reply
- 2009-11-24 17:20
- 3pH0
- U
- nikiafan
- Report
- 0
Indeed, it looks like baby from Nokia 6500 Slide and iPod nano, but it`s not tragic, it could look much worse (e.g. Motorolas and SEs); specs are very acceptible, except lack of WiFi,camera and display resolution, but it can be forgiven for it`s cuteness and, I hope, reasonable price when it comes on market. I predict it fantastic future; well done, Nokia.
- Reply
- 2009-11-24 16:19
- 3LUN
- C

