4.9-inch Sharp Aquos Zeta SH-02E droid headed to NTT DoCoMo

11 October, 2012 | Comments (68) | Post your comment

NTT DoCoMo announced its winter lineup, which consists of 16 new (for the carrier, at least) models, including the Samsung Galaxy S III, Note II and the Sony Xperia AX. The real attention grabber is the Sharp Aquos Zeta SH-02E, which promises to give the LG Optimus G a run for its money.

The Aquos Zeta has a 4.9" 720p IGZO TFT display (a world's first, IGZO is supposed to be more power-efficient) and is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064 chipset with quad-core Krait CPU at 1.5GHz and Adreno 320 graphics. The Sharp SH-02 will launch with Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich.


Sharp Aquos Zeta SH-02E

The main camera on the phone is a 16MP shooter with LED flash and there's a 1.2MP front-facing camera.

On the connectivity side there's LTE (100Mbps/37.5Mbps up/down) and NFC with mobile payment support. The Sharp Aquos Zeta will also support both 1seg and NOTTV broadcasting.

The phone will have a large capacity battery (2000+mAh or more, the specs sheet didnít give the exact number) and will be both dust and waterproof (IP57, IP5X).

The Sharp Aquos Zeta SH-02E is expected to launch in November or December.

Source


 

 

4.9-inch Sharp Aquos Zeta SH-02E droid headed to NTT DoCoMo - reader comments

  • Yard

I own this phone and everything except the speaker are excellent. I can of course put the spotlight for the camera, awesome quality! Battery life is above great and the screen may be the best i've ever seen. I wish Sharp / Fujitsu and other bran...

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-24 20:57
  • L0W4
  • cacde

https://www.nttdocomo.co.jp/product/smart_phone/ sh02f/index.html release on jan 2014

  • Reply
  • 2013-11-21 06:20
  • 70gJ
  • eka

Because SHARP thought that no one could buy this. This is about 83,790 YEN in Japan which means about worth 1,100 USD at the release day. But docomo disburse 52,920 YEN in exchange for 2 years contract. So, many people could afford it in Japan. Any...

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-16 01:59
  • T%tq