Nokia 8800 Arte

Nokia

Popularity

Daily interest
0.4%
Total hits:
1525573

Voting results

Design
8.5
Features
8.3
Performance
8.3
Votes:
15187

General 2G Network GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G Network UMTS 2100
Announced 2007, November. Released 2007, December
Status Discontinued
Body Dimensions 109 x 45.6 x 14.6 mm, 65 cc
Weight 150 g
Display Type OLED, 16M colors
Size 240 x 320 pixels, 2.0 inches (~200 ppi pixel density)
Protection Scratch-resistant glass
Sound Alert types Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3, video ringtones ringtones
Loudspeaker Yes
3.5mm jack No
Memory Card slot No
Phonebook 1000 entries, Photocall
Call records 20 dialed, 20 received, 20 missed calls
Internal 1 GB
Data GPRS Class 10 (4+1/3+2 slots), 32 - 48 kbps
EDGE Class 10, 236.8 kbps
Speed Yes, 384 kbps
WLAN No
Bluetooth Yes, v2.0
USB Yes, microUSB OTG
Camera Primary 3.15 MP, 2048x1536 pixels, autofocus
Video Yes, VGA@15fps
Secondary No
Features Sensors Accelerometer
Messaging SMS, MMS, Email
Browser WAP 2.0/xHTML
Radio No
Games Yes + Downloadable
GPS No
Java Yes, MIDP 2.1
Colors Black
 - MP3/AAC/eAAC player
- Voice memo
- Predictive text input
- Calculator

Battery   Standard battery, Li-Ion 1000 mAh (BL-4U)
Stand-by Up to 300 h
Talk time Up to 3 h
Misc Price group

Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more

Nokia 8800 Arte - user opinions and reviews

  • pongz

nokia 8800 was great, i experienced when i have that phone, i lost last year, now i have only nokia 8600 luna even i miss my 8800,if ever i sell my 8600 luna how much you offer, im from philippines, very presentable my 8600 luna. thank you

  • Reply
  • 2011-12-06 11:15
  • uSM}
  • R
  • Anonymous

test mode and not work

  • Reply
  • 2011-08-27 22:41
  • fmjD
  • Q
  • rerum natura

This is a beautiful and simple phone. What a phone should really be. I own both the oiginal 8800 and the 8800 Arte. The Arte costs over RM4000 whereas the Sapphire Arte is over RM5000. Even the original 8800 in silver was sold for nearly RM3000. But ...

  • Reply
  • 2011-08-12 09:55
  • PTEW
  • H