Sagem Roland Garros - user opinions and reviews
- miq luna
- Report
> In reply to Dennis @ 2008-05-15 15:30 from m0LEyour boss must be rich
- Reply
- 2010-02-19 03:46
- vxt3
- R
- Pif
- Report
Well before my new 5800XM i had sagem my 511 as my secondary phone and i can just say it sucks a.. cant even touch teh best srands S.E. samsung or all mighty Nokia
cheers
- Reply
- 2009-08-21 20:11
- 04M}
- U
- Sudeep
- Report
It phone looks extremely good . But it does not have the good features
- Reply
- 2009-08-10 13:41
- t}a3
- C
- Ashton
- Report
it seems that there are so many people who doesn't understand anything or never used SAGEM.
If a designer with a well known name agree to work on my511x it means it has style, other wise no designer would agree to work on it. maybe my taste is different, but as a designer my self i can say that it is well designed and stylish.
For those who say SAGEM is not good, try to buy and use SAGEM phone and you will see that Most beloved Nokia or Samsung or any other phone fails even with the most high end hardware and software to the simplicity, well thought designs and life proof SAGEM.Yea, the phone is not perfect, but there are no perfect phones!
Please, the ones who say oh what a bad phones or ugly save your time and don't spam, most of people who say SAGEM has bad quality never touched SAGEM technology, pure SAGEM is top quality.
I can tell Nokia phones are ones of the most ugly ones and has awful quality, if it slips from a hand, you are forced to go to the fixing services, if SAGEM slipped from a hand, it works as it was still new one. maybe I am lucky, but 10 times and still no issues, works as new.
- Reply
- 2009-08-10 13:27
- phZ3
- U
- Tony Ericsson
- Report
I love design for this pone, it looks like sexy. Go Roland Garros
- Reply
- 2009-07-18 18:52
- mRvT
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
what's for Sagem high-end for others is low-end
but still i think they could make good phones if they tried to work more on phones features rather than design
- Reply
- 2009-06-23 14:36
- 0v@Y
- U
- mr truth
- Report
plz sagem,you have to work on your design.it is not appealing to the eye,i cant just think of buying this phone with my money for myself or for a friend,it is looks so aweful.
- Reply
- 2009-06-12 13:45
- mi$}
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
This phone is ugly as hell. i wouldn't use it even if you gave it for free.
- Reply
- 2009-03-23 15:19
- mjPY
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-09-28 09:26 from 3cHJwhy?
- Reply
- 2009-03-20 03:56
- PHkK
- R
- Tony Ericsson
- Report
me think phone this better worked than nokia. It haves great sounds for tone rings.camera much gooder than 1,3mp of phones different. Me rate this phone like iphone
- Reply
- 2009-02-13 17:57
- mRvT
- U
- julio burnik
- Report
i suppose this will be a reliable phone for those person.. who just use a phone for basic use.. simple m phone being releases by manufacturers. ay geting more complicated... so much feature... new problems esp. to software..
- Reply
- 2008-12-21 20:52
- TfX2
- C
- Sung Sam Hui
- Report
This Phone is realy ugly one. Dont know why this company is stil making so ugly phones! This SuX.
Nokia! Conecting people!
- Reply
- 2008-10-14 16:56
- n3sH
- U
- walker
- Report
> In reply to your Name @ 2008-10-02 00:00 from 0FuVI say SAGEM have the most better manufacturing phones in the world, the phones dont failure that other brands. SAGEM is good worked, to resist water and shock. its the best in the world.
- Reply
- 2008-10-12 02:00
- LyE4
- R
- your Name
- Report
sagem has always been bad with phones..... so disappointing
- Reply
- 2008-10-02 00:00
- 0FuV
- U
- jimbob
- Report
weird stupid and looks unuseable seems good 4 a 2 year old
- Reply
- 2008-09-18 17:19
- 2GBK
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed
Facebook