Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III vs. HTC One X: Alien vs. Predator
Samsung Galaxy S II ICS review: Sugar coatedSamsung T939 Behold 2 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.0
- Features
-
7.9
- Performance
-
7.7
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Daniel @ 2009-10-07 15:40 from MVg6 - click to readHopefully, unlike the Galaxy, it'll have the new 800MHz processor from the Samsung Moment.
- Reply
- 2009-10-08 18:54
- THIa
- R
- Daniel
- Report
- 0
> In reply to chilisweet @ 2009-10-07 03:22 from 9xmx - click to readits exactly the same as the i7500 galaxy
- Reply
- 2009-10-07 15:40
- MVg6
- R
- chilisweet
- Report
- 0
finally an android phone with a decent camera! Yeah for flash and zoom! I can't wait. Hopefully it has better coverage than the first behold.
- Reply
- 2009-10-07 03:22
- 9xmx
- U
- Billiam
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Mustafa @ 2009-10-06 05:31 from 43kD - click to readBecause it's not in direct competition with the IPhone, plus this is a smartphone we're talking about here, unlike that overhyped piece of junk from Apple.
- Reply
- 2009-10-06 11:18
- IaHH
- R
- Mustafa
- Report
- 0
So much of the display is wasted with the bottom navigation controls. I also don't understand why Samsung doesn't make the screen 3.5 inches, then there would be an all touch android device that's REAL competition for the iPhone!
- Reply
- 2009-10-06 05:31
- 43kD
- U
- iphonePhilo
- Report
- 0
> In reply to B @ 2009-10-05 23:19 from 3Jby - click to readNo differences, some minor changes in Edge, Gps, Bluetooth. The main thing which could be a great difference is the processor. We don't know yet which processor is running in this new Samsung T939
- Reply
- 2009-10-06 00:56
- 3sDE
- R
- B
- Report
- 0
Why is everyone saying this is something new?
Whats the difference between this and the galaxy i7500. Except for the cosmetic differences, ie: the keypad area.
Can someone tell me please?
- Reply
- 2009-10-05 23:19
- 3Jby
- Q
- AndroidGuy
- Report
- 0
This looks like samsung usa's attempt at the samsung galaxy thats in europe. Its basically the same specs.
- Reply
- 2009-10-05 19:34
- 47WN
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Chad @ 2009-10-05 17:51 from Q}GC - click to readur crazy...anything 4GB an up HAS TO BE SDHC..
- Reply
- 2009-10-05 19:27
- 4QJ3
- R
- Freak1C
- Report
- 0
So this is what all us galaxy fans have been waiting for, and the specs look much better than the Galaxy Lite, w flash and 3.2 in screen. Nice!
shortcomings:
no standalone GPS
only 16 Gb
no HSUPA
It seems possible those all could be fixed/improved with a firmware change...
- Reply
- 2009-10-05 18:53
- BV@L
- C
- iphonePhilo
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-05 17:18 from nbuy - click to readI've shouldn't judge the phone by looking on the small picture. When I zoomed the phone picture I changed my mind. Sorry to say it is looking like a toy, it is not.
By the way what do you mean Android does not support more? You mean more what?
Btw, it is not bad from Samsung, the phone is thin.
- Reply
- 2009-10-05 18:14
- 3sDE
- R
- Chad
- Report
- 0
What? Only microSD, not microSDHC? Seriously? I want a new phone that can double as my mp3 player, 16GB just isn't enough.
- Reply
- 2009-10-05 17:51
- Q}GC
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to iPhonePhilo @ 2009-10-05 10:59 from 3sDE - click to readStop calling it a toy. The only reason why the specs are bad is because Android doesn't support more. Else they would've been better.
- Reply
- 2009-10-05 17:18
- nbuy
- R
- aster0id
- Report
- 0
Its gonna create a tough competition for some high enders like the HTC hero and N97. Design is perfect, its just that they should have chosen black rather than brown.
- Reply
- 2009-10-05 17:11
- tE$W
- C
