Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.2
- Features
-
6.9
- Performance
-
7.0
- jojo
- Report
- 0
so nice phone.easy to carry. for me it's the best,cheaper phone.performance is ok.
pls update us how to configure wap.
- Reply
- 2004-09-17 07:10
- U
- Vaneijk
- Report
- 0
Only 196 AR$ (54.4 €) in Argentina. Great value for its price. The only problem is that you can't get any decent ringtones for this phone!
- Reply
- 2004-09-14 00:40
- U
- Lucifer
- Report
- 0
hey dudes and a nother thing if anyone knows WAP sites to download tones (not the alcatel site) PLEASE tell me cause the tones and sounds in the alcatel site sucks.the wolf is the best there is
- Reply
- 2004-09-02 21:51
- U
- Lucifer
- Report
- 0
hey dudes. i was asking myself the other day why do i cant download pictures and tones and i found out that alcatel OT 332 have AMR format.thats different from most phones
- Reply
- 2004-09-02 21:46
- U
- R K PILLAI
- Report
- 0
I have purchased one alcatel one touch 332 the booklet which I have got is in deutsch language so please give me more information in english how to operate it.thankling you, RK pillai.
- Reply
- 2004-08-13 15:53
- U
- Steve Sanders
- Report
- 0
How do I set up a distribution (mailing) list for texts to a group of people ?
- Reply
- 2004-08-13 14:17
- U
- sum1cute@hotmail.com
- Report
- 0
It seems like i'm the only one that can download polo ringtones go to this site if u r in australia it only cost $3.60 per tone
- Reply
- 2004-08-04 15:18
- U
- madhawa
- Report
- 0
hi
what is the Battery performance for the one touch 332 phone?
- Reply
- 2004-07-26 09:58
- U
- amie
- Report
- 0
need any website to download polyponic ringtones for my alcatel 332 .......plzzzzzzzzzzzz
- Reply
- 2004-07-16 07:01
- U
- smil3y
- Report
- 0
Not so Good !!! It doesn't have GPRS and it's display is to small !!!
- Reply
- 2004-06-08 11:26
- U
- Malaysian guy
- Report
- 0
This is a good and cheerful phone for it's price. Can't expect too much from a value phone. Proved to be tough and reliable after i dropped it a lot of times.
- Reply
- 2004-05-23 17:48
- U

