- dade
- Report
- 0
My very first phone back in 1998, this yellow number. Cute beep when you get a text message and the blinking LED. Battery life's very dependable and the desktop charger is cool (though not very portable). Overall this phone was a prime in its time and is a protoype of future useful phone functions.
- Reply
- 2007-03-21 09:19
- RxnW
- U
- Scott Oliver
- Report
- 0
this phone is surprisingly good in bed... #### battery life, so is a bit of a quick finisher, better than my k800i! x ps.tesco value batteries rule! x
- Reply
- 2007-03-04 11:27
- TkEk
- U
- jana
- Report
- 0
this phone is the best alcatel are great the best thing about this phone is that it has regular batteries !!!
P.S it sucks
- Reply
- 2006-11-17 21:22
- S9hq
- U
- mxv
- Report
- 0
dunno what the guy about the camera and such is on about its a 2 line monocrome mobile... i mean look it even takes duracell batterys :O
- Reply
- 2006-11-06 22:01
- MuBu
- U
- Devil
- Report
- 0
What are you saying
it dosnt even have a camera and you think its 3G its so old you cant even buy it any more so how can it have a camera with 3.5 mp or how can it have 3G
- Reply
- 2006-11-02 13:19
- p3Mj
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Its really good phone..... The FM is one of the nicest FMs.....good display of 262 K colors...And the camera quality is superb...3.5MP camera..... The mp3 player is awesome and the dont ask about the battery time... It stands for 5 days.... I think its really a good 3G phone.....With a support of Edge and it has dual speaker.....Its weight is very less i.e. only 45 gms.....Oh my Lord... This phone is out of the world..... The Bluetooth and IR works properly with other mobile phones:)
- Reply
- 2006-09-18 12:37
- ijpk
- U
- Tahlula
- Report
- 0
my friend used to have this phone. it was great i was so jealous. its like a breeze block now thou. there is no backspace button you have to start th whole msg again. how mobiles have advanced!!!
- Reply
- 2005-11-09 17:09
- mytu
- U
- frishki
- Report
- 0
My 1st phone ever. Bought it in 1999. I had it for one year and I throw it away few years ago. Now I wish I didn't... :)
- Reply
- 2005-11-06 15:02
- Tj@k
- U
- george
- Report
- 0
My very 1st GSM phone! It was extremely hard to use but I got used to it. 1st love definitely never dies. The toughest phone I ever had. I had it retired since it simply refused to die. The best phone ever for me as far as toughness is concerned, far better than any Nokia phones I ever had.
- Reply
- 2005-11-03 09:58
- PSvn
- U
- Nick
- Report
- 0
I bought this phone when it was new, and despite a hard life, it still works on alkalines (the rechargable battery died). Its completely out of date now of course.
I replaced it years ago, but I see it as a piece of retro chic when all other phones were black or grey.
- Reply
- 2005-06-10 20:29
- iLSH
- U
- Roberto
- Report
- 0
Look at this color man...are u nutz buying that crap? :)
- Reply
- 2005-05-20 17:54
- P2dw
- U
- harouna
- Report
- 0
alcatel is my life without this phone your life is tasteless .
and i need the code term of this phone.
- Reply
- 2005-04-23 17:09
- N7}r
- U
- mae
- Report
- 0
I own one of this alcatel one touch easy years ago but with the newer cellphone models, I have've pushed it to the back of my cabinet. I was hoping to give it to my niece as her first cellphone to tinker with and I just unearthed it. The problem is I can't find the manual and I've forgotten how to use it. Can you help me?
- Reply
- 2004-10-08 12:49
- U
- Kay
- Report
- 0
My opinion is it is driving me crazy!!....Where is the backspace when you have txt the wrong letter :)
- Reply
- 2004-09-14 11:53
- U
- N.R.Lakshminarasimha
- Report
- 0
Dear sir, I have a instrument Alcatel once-touch easy which is now have a battery changed with a lower volt. I tried to rechanrge tyhe same but the same is not rechargeing. May i request you to let me know if the instrument is to be given to any of your local service shops in New Delhi where I can get the same revitalised and also if I can obtain a spare battery with a recharger.
Thanks
Regards,
NRLN/11.03.03
- Reply
- 2003-03-11 23:04
- U


