Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.5
- Features
-
5.9
- Performance
-
6.0
- Mr.BoB
- Report
- 0
it's a gud 4n.cuz low weight,gud battery,and can use many yrs without any repair.bt there's no bluetooth,no mp3(support only recorded from 4n),don't support mp4(support only recorded from the camera of the 4n),no usb,no cardslot,no loudspeaker & can't use audios as ring tone.bt it's gud for simple usage.(only for calling and to hve 4tos)4n is not bad....
- Reply
- 2012-04-29 20:49
- iwpE
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
this phone is really loud, i got in trouble turning it on in class even when kids were talking and laughing
- Reply
- 2008-02-09 05:14
- jUtb
- U
- feccy
- Report
- 0
it's cute..but,there no bluetooth and also infrared..so,nothing much i can do with this handphone...
- Reply
- 2007-01-26 10:07
- PIxF
- U
- silcosilva
- Report
- 0
this phone was one of the best value camera phone when it actually hit a price of S$99.90 in Singapore for a 1st hand one.dissappointing features are bad pc synchronise system,0.3k CMOS camera a bit dull and the claimed mp3 ringtone supports does not work.battery life are very excellent and the weight is very surprising.
- Reply
- 2007-01-06 04:41
- vjsp
- U
- Robert G.
- Report
- 0
I bought this phone from an ebay seller. For the price, it's a good phone. The only downside is it doesn't have Bluetooth, but not many bargain phones do. Overall it's a reliabe phone that makes a great replacement for those free phones you get when you sign up for a plan.
- Reply
- 2007-01-03 13:02
- j5fk
- U


Login with
Facebook
Google
Sign up