"If Apple patents are upheld long-term, it will force the industry toward innovation and differentiation," says Gartner analyst Michael Gartenberg. "That's not a bad thing for the market and for consumers."
this is the first time that when i
charge my 4s without
using it ,the battery is like
draining, even all apps are
closed. i dont know what happen! i think my battery is starting to be abnormal,
Anonymous, 25 Aug 2012Sumsung plastic copies are indeed plastic copiesSay thankyou for the page full of Plastic Copies I gave you to copy-paste for your statements...
And I'll ask the question again, What is your opinion on Apple not including a Street View?
Does not having it make it better than Google Maps like you seem to believe?
And just remember Apple was convicted for Patent infringement for all of their phones in South Korea where it was only a few for Samsung.
Regarding damages, the jury finds that Apple should be awarded $1,051,855,000 in damages for willfully violating Apple's patents and trade dress.
Next up are Samsung's claims against Apple.
The jury has found for Apple regarding its alleged infringement of Samsung's utility patents on every claim, however Apple did not prove they were invalid. The jury did not award Samsung any damages.
Finally, Apple did not prove that Samsung violated antitrust obligations regarding its FRAND patents.
Apple did prove that Samsung is barred from enforcing its '516 and '941 patents.
Samsung has lost on almost every significant count.
So far, the jury has found largely favor of Apple in the Apple vs. Samsung trial after three days of deliberations.
On the first claim, regarding the '381 "bounce back" patent, the jury finds Samsung guilty on all counts. Samsung infringed on Apple's patent on a wide variety of products.
On Apple's "pinch and zoom" '915 patent, the jury found that Samsung infringed on all but three products.
For the "double-tap to zoom" '163 patent, the jury found that Samsung infringed on a wide number of products, but not all.
The jury found that Samsung took actions that it knew or should have known were infringing across the '381, '915, and '163 patents on most, though not on all, counts.
For the '677 patent, covering Apple's trade dress registration of the look of the front of the iPhone, the jury found that Samsung did infringe on most devices, but again, not all.
For the D'087 patent, covering Apple's trade dress registration of the look of the back of the iPhone, the jury found that Samsung did infringe on some devices, but not all.
For the '305 patent, covering the trade dress registration of the iPhone's home screen, the jury found that Samsung infringed across most devices.
For the D'889 patent, covering the trade dress registration of the iPad's appearance, the jury found that Samsung's tablets do not infringe -- one of the first victories for Samsung.
On the question of whether Samsung Korea knew or should have known it was inducing US subsidiaries to infringe on the D'677, D'087, D'305 and/or D'889 patents, the jury found in favor of Apple across a wide number of phones and patents, though not on the '889 patent regarding the iPad. These two questions are significant for Apple to receive damages.
On the question of whether Samsung's infringement was willful, the jury again found for Apple on a number of patents and devices.
Finally, the jury ruled that all of Apple's patents are valid.
Apple stock up to $ 675 as a result of winning in Federal Court,
And I am making LOTS of $$$
Patents are valid and sumsung infriinged most of them:
Anonymous, 24 Aug 2012Success is measured in $$$$
Not cheap talkAnd also shows like X Factor have made a Butt load of money through manufactured acts but just because they've made a lot of money and outsell everyone else does that actually make them the best? No because it's all about style over substance and using the media to convince people to be interested, and Apple works in a similar way convincing the sort of Suckers who watch adverts and can't help but to want to buy everything they see advertised.
But don't worry I know you are incapable of understanding this so you will disagree because you don't know any better.
Anonymous, 24 Aug 2012I dumped my stand alone GPS because my maps app on my Android is way better with its constant ... moreI actually use my TomTom and my S3 in my car, because I usually use the TomTom for like the longer journeys and my S3 around the towns and things and if I'm struggling to find somewhere then Street View always does the job and I love the way the built in compass makes the Street View always show the way you looking.
Anonymous, 24 Aug 2012Success is measured in $$$$
Not cheap talkApple gets the $$$$s and customers get the phones but all you seem to care about is that Apple is making more money, when it is a fact that Apple makes that money by charging people more for everything and only giving people features that can make Apple money while Android users are given a lot more because Google actually listen to their customers and adds as many features as possible so people are getting their money's worth, but again none of this matters to you.
And like I asked before what is your opinion on Apple not including a Street View?
Anonymous, 24 Aug 2012Preposterous! Is that the only thing you can brag? We are talking about features here.Success is measured in $$$$
Not cheap talk
Anonymous, 24 Aug 2012Market Value of Listed Security: $ 176,429,548,770 Goog Market Value of Listed Securit... morePreposterous! Is that the only thing you can brag? We are talking about features here.
Parker., 24 Aug 2012Yeah Street View just brings navigation into a whole new level and which is literally true 3D ... moreI dumped my stand alone GPS because my maps app on my Android is way better with its constant update. It gives me turn by turn navigation on a 3D satellite view. Upon arrival on your destination, it shows you the picture of how the place looks like with the option of checking the place in a cool street view. That's why most of my friends who own iPhone are jealous with what my Android can do.