Asus M930 - user opinions and reviews

Asus

Popularity

Daily interest
0.5%
Total hits:
116274

Voting results

Design
7.2
Features
7.4
Performance
7.4
Votes:
195

I purchased it for its features. But within a month of purchase one device was replaced. The replacement is yet to satisfy me in battery performance and pre-loaded softwares. The internet purformance is very poor. But may be I am yet to appreciate the technology. Let that benefit of doubt be with the pretty device.

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-26 06:48
  • jAYq
  • H

No..its not touchscreen. But cool and stylish.Im happy with the performance.

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-22 15:34
  • vGfi
  • U

> In reply to Ajay @ 2008-06-13 07:50 from vGfxIs it touch screen

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-19 02:58
  • PWYY
  • Q

yesterday i hav purchased ASUS M-930...Realy its a good phone it is value for money.
Thanks ASUS for INTRODUCING such a good devive in the market.
regards,
Isha Agarwal

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-14 08:31
  • vGfy
  • H

only just seen this phone and love it i was going to get the toshiba G910 but now i might get this

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-14 01:46
  • 3ae4
  • U

Iam using communicator from last 2 years & iam very use & freindly to its menu style nd fetaure dats why i didnt like any other device but this ASUS M-930 is realy good one in design as well as handy & light in weight,the plus point to this device is it is on WINDOWS platform so i would love to have this device.

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-13 07:58
  • vGfx
  • U

Features are cool...and smaller size make is much better.

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-13 07:52
  • vGfx
  • U

I liked the webcam feature and great deisgn.Would love to use the smallest communicator on windows platform.

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-13 07:50
  • vGfx
  • U

I beleive this is the one phone by asus which can nearly kill nokia e90 market in terms of price & specfs... i am just awaiting when this phne gets launch in india i would be teh first person to buy this peice.....

  • Reply
  • 2008-05-26 07:49
  • ijZN
  • C

I'm really excited to play with this phone. Kudos to ASUS for employing the communicator design.
To WM purists, it can't be helped for this phone to be compared to the E90 since it's the E90's exact counterpart in the Windows Mobile Universe.
Most of the qualms revolve on the smallish internal display which can be explained by Microsoft's restriction on limiting the smartphones' display to the 320x240 pixel resolution; which is also good since a user would find it less difficult to install apps on the standard QVGA resolution.
second problem would be the phone's internal keyboard which is made of a rubber pad. All of us know how hard it is to press rubber pads vs qwerty keyboards with individualized keys.

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-22 12:10
  • vxiX
  • U

Nice structure and the LCD inside is just smaller I with it could be bigger. But I have the Asus P735 and it gave my satisfactions I'm sure that this will give a bang to your expectations.

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-14 18:01
  • vxnL
  • U

Really love the form factor, unfortunately that's where the similarity ends with the Nokia E90 communicator. The biggest disappointment is the internal screen size & not touch sensitive, overal specs acceptable.

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-10 05:05
  • TLFE
  • U

i wonder how people have already "had a play with it" when it was only recently announced. and please, stop comparing it to nokia e90. the phones are class apart. just because they share similar design does not mean that they function exactly the same. just thank asus that they though that this design would be better when SE, samshung and motorola failed to do so. i was planning to buy HTC S730 but now that i have has a look at the spec sheet and pics of this baby i guess i should wait.

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-06 14:26
  • vG66
  • U

asus phones are very good phone, but the one of the disadvantage is the keys all are very hard to press .

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-03 12:24
  • RGqF
  • U

Had a play with it. Really liked the designe of the handset. The internal screen is really small. The weight of the handset is better the E90. Like the handset waiting for the price tag to come out.

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-03 06:43
  • PN$q
  • U

dissapointing.. small inside screen, ridiculous resolution.. nothing special, NokiaE90 much better, but will see the price-tag. If it gonna cost up to 300E, maybe not so bad choice.

  • Reply
  • 2008-03-22 19:44
  • iBbF
  • U

this one looks good with all it's goodies

  • Reply
  • 2008-03-22 16:57
  • wYEM
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.