Gigabyte g-Smart i350 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Voting results
- Design
-
7.3
- Features
-
7.1
- Performance
-
7.3
- Votes:
- 187
- Hits:
- 80626
- barkin
- Report
the major problem with this pda i have is the battery. the standard battery is very weak. i d like to know with which battery i should replace the default one.
there some other issues which i dislike but i think they re related to wm6, and not specific to the device itself.
there is no tv tuner, no g3 which i do not mind. i received an asnwer from gigabyte for the sar value is approx. 0.26 which i find to be nice.
- Reply
- 2008-06-17 17:18
- MZZf
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
Gigabyte works really poor on PDA devices
there are 6 diffrent Gsmart Model that actually all of them is One.
Gsmart I300,I350,MW700,MS800,MS820,MW998...Compare All of this model!
besides Gigabyte Support For Gsmart is awful.
- Reply
- 2008-06-07 18:04
- nsDy
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
I am sorry I bought this phone, and want to return it for a full refund. The stylus is thin and telescopic, and oddly located at the left bottom. It is of such poor quality that soon the plastic cap breaks off, and after that the stylus is completely useless. I am left with broken styli and an unuseable phone.
- Reply
- 2008-04-18 16:30
- SiQH
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Is there aTV tuner (PAL or Secam) as on the i120?
If not, Gigabytes major selling point went down the drain!
- Reply
- 2008-04-12 15:19
- MMZk
- U
- ms
- Report
i will wait for ms 820 or ms 808. anybody know sure about 808 has gps or not?
- Reply
- 2008-03-10 21:15
- 0IyT
- U
- mickey
- Report
well then why do we want dual/tri/quad band? why would you want gprs if you don't use it? the point is the phone is far more versatile with 3G, etc. and other features even if you don't use it now (which I do being on 3AUS where they don't offer any non-3G phones obviously). fink b4 u txt rply
- Reply
- 2008-02-07 02:13
- PEJL
- U
- QiangQiang
- Report
to Andyhr pls la wh0 say w/o 3G is a shame huh?? y d0es 1 wifi ph0ne need 3g f0r huh?? think be4 u say...
- Reply
- 2008-01-10 10:55
- PFM2
- U
- jonathan
- Report
its looks great, but, it donīt have 3g support and the ram is too small (64 instead 128).
But it is a god phone, wifi, camera with autofocus, sdhc, etc.
I understand why its dont have 3g, the reason is the wifi, but it can be better with its.
- Reply
- 2007-12-18 19:24
- iBtv
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
this phone is horrible.
this is experienced from the test unit. the screen is quite dim. there is not builtin 3G and the wifi and GSM cellure reception is not too good.
But that just my opinion of the test unit. the retail unit might be different, that I will not judge.
- Reply
- 2007-11-17 02:12
- q}4i
- U
- Safraz
- Report
Hwy, Im planing to buy this phone, dose any one can tell will my hard earn money will go for nothing if i buy this
Thanks
Safraz
- Reply
- 2007-10-23 18:32
- w9La
- U
- Ranu
- Report
Windows 6.0 is ok. 512 mhz processor ok. 2 mp camera Not ok. Looking just like o2. Nice but i like o2 xda atom. Slim & good looks. Screen is not too big. But ok. Nice mobile. I like it for slim & stylish looks.. Thanks
- Reply
- 2007-10-17 23:36
- PWYY
- U
- Andyhr
- Report
How can it be called a smart phone, and it does'nt even support 3g. Gigabyte all over. Their products all look good on the box but always fail to deliver. Their motherboards are a prime example.
3G is crucial by any standard today, especially a phone of this supposed calibre. Shame
- Reply
- 2007-10-11 21:51
- mFy4
- U
- Masab Umair
- Report
this pocket pc is very good. first mobile with high resolution 480*640 and high 256k colors in one device.
but the most irritated is ram, only 64mb.
all its competent devices have 128mb of ram
- Reply
- 2007-10-05 22:15
- 25LH
- U
- RAP5
- Report
Dang.. all this but no 3G or even EDGE? Wonder why they left this out?
- Reply
- 2007-10-05 17:39
- TdYH
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed