HP iPAQ h6315

HP

Popularity

Daily interest
  N/A
Total hits:
193514

Voting results

Design
7.3
Features
7.3
Performance
6.6
Votes:
11

General 2G Network GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
SIM Mini-SIM
Announced 2004, 4Q
Status Discontinued
Body Dimensions 119 x 75 x 18.7 mm (4.69 x 2.95 x 0.74 in)
Weight 190 g (6.70 oz)
Keyboard QWERTY
Display Type TFT resistive touchscreen, 65K colors
Size 240 x 320 pixels, 3.5 inches, 53 x 71 mm (~114 ppi pixel density)
Sound Alert types Vibration; Polyphonic, MP3 ringtones
Loudspeaker Yes
3.5mm jack No
Memory Card slot SD, up to 1 GB
Internal 64 MB RAM, 64 MB ROM
Data GPRS Yes
EDGE No
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11b
Bluetooth v1.1
Infrared port Yes
USB Yes
Camera Primary VGA, 640 x 480 pixels
Video No
Secondary No
Features OS Microsoft Windows Mobile 2003 PocketPC Phone Edition
Chipset TI OMAP 1510
CPU ARM925T
Messaging SMS, Email, Instant Messaging
Browser HTML (PocketIE)
Radio No
GPS No
Java No
Colors Silver
 - Pocket Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF viewer)
- Organizer
Battery   Li-Ion 1800 mAh battery
Stand-by
Talk time

Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more

HP iPAQ h6315 - user opinions and reviews

  • Chuck

My first exposure to a proper smartphone, after the early Nokia communicators. $1600 at Harvey Norman in 2004 and looked spaceage in its day. Mostly for the top executive types. Today a lot of phones with better features at $300. But in 2004 this was...

  • Reply
  • 2012-12-15 14:36
  • GRQx
  • R
  • jacoib

this phone kick ass u cant compare the iphone to this phone yes the procceser in the i phone is much faster. HTC has picked up the missing puzzle and has started a new wavw of PDA and phones, good luck........

  • Reply
  • 2010-08-24 21:03
  • j8En
  • U
  • ,...

wow comparing this thig to a iphone is like comparing apples to oranges, processor speed is half what an iphone is, having owned both of these phones, yes the iphone is much better but its also a newer device think of what was around in 2004 (mo...

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-18 20:58
  • 9yFQ
  • U