HP iPAQ hw6915 - user opinions and reviews

HP

Popularity

Daily interest
0.6%
Total hits:
418516

Voting results

Design
7.8
Features
8.2
Performance
8.0
Votes:
1041

not that powerfull of a phone it's a pqpc i like this phone to , forget abote the camera eaven if it's deasent on this one , nothing compared to the e60 wi fi i/e/g voip.
those are 2 good phones on hp did good with a 1.3 mp camera

  • Reply
  • 2006-05-26 05:58
  • 4Bck
  • U

not that powerfull of a phone it's a pqpc i like this phone to , forget abote the camera eaven if it's deasent on this one , nothing compared to the e61 wi fi i/e/g voip.
those are 2 good phones on hp did good with a 1.3 mp camera

  • Reply
  • 2006-05-26 05:54
  • 4Bck
  • U

very cool phone, i was wondering can i install gps navigation software?

http://hotend.com

  • Reply
  • 2006-05-22 23:59
  • jy0M
  • U

skype on edge unlomited or on wi-fi

  • Reply
  • 2006-05-21 06:40
  • 4Bck
  • U

I just love mine I use the gps for golf, I am a hair stylist and use it to book appointments etc.. the batt. is a weak linc other than that its great

  • Reply
  • 2006-05-16 04:08
  • 4HPD
  • U

HP Phones are not worth it... stick to computers

  • Reply
  • 2006-05-13 10:18
  • 4TGB
  • U

Too bad !
I had a1 hw6515 and hate it so much that want to take a look with HP.
In fact, HP has never took care with their customer: what they want, what they desire, what they can do ...
tireddddd

  • Reply
  • 2006-05-01 12:37
  • wvFP
  • U

Can you put skype on the 6515?

  • Reply
  • 2006-04-24 15:42
  • QsNS
  • U

best phone ever. put skype on it. put xten on it. call around the world @ minimal cost. use sms fast & @ will. this is the best ever.

  • Reply
  • 2006-04-15 14:51
  • iLTH
  • U

got my 6515 a month ago, hate it so much that I am selling for an O2 atom. i can only guess that 6900 can be that much better as the 6515 really really suck. Hp just didn't make any effort to connect the software(windows) with its hardward (THE KEYBOARD) almost useless. goodluck if you are interest in buying one.
ps. another sucky thing is the camera and its software, just don't work at all compare with my old xda o2

  • Reply
  • 2006-04-10 16:22
  • PWJa
  • U

i have the 6515 and it looks and seems to be the exact same thing. sucks they didnt upgrade to a 2.0MP camera. they should of made it 3G. dissapointed in HP

  • Reply
  • 2006-04-05 08:25
  • 4WYx
  • U

Looks like it is available on UK's HP site already...

  • Reply
  • 2006-04-05 05:03
  • ibbU
  • U

Can any advise whether SMS messages and call history be transferred to one Windows Mobile 2005 based smartphone (such as O2 Atom) to other Windows Mobile 2005 based smartphone (such as iPAQ hw6900), or vice versa?

  • Reply
  • 2006-03-25 12:16
  • PE6d
  • U

Has anyone found i miniSD barcode reader ?

  • Reply
  • 2006-03-19 20:25
  • i59x
  • U

Can we hear from someone, anyone, who has actually used the 6900 and can speak with some experience? Has the phone been released yet anywhere in the world? Or are we all reading and writing about a "work-in-progress"?

  • Reply
  • 2006-03-17 03:24
  • kexy
  • U

Are they make some model that is attractive for eye.Desing is first thing peple they see.First place for the ugly phone/pda.

  • Reply
  • 2006-03-16 23:18
  • m1YG
  • U

Cons:
- 64MB mem instead of 128MB
- only 1.3MB camera
- too thick (18mm!!)
- no 3G
- Bluetooth v1.1 (v1.2 is out for a while)
- WiFi only 802.11b (802.11g is the latest)
- Windows OS (
- made by HP (customer service + reliability)

  • Reply
  • 2006-03-14 07:24
  • 4TF5
  • U

HORRIBLE! is an understatement maybe nauseating is the right word for this looks more like a calculator than a phone,to make these worse lousy asMORINHO (NAS)

  • Reply
  • 2006-03-12 21:58
  • N7x1
  • U

Overall this phone is definately an improvment from hw6500. But, I agree why they had to put up a whole new show. Only thing they have added is WM 5.0, and WiFi, and 4g weight. But, they should have upgraded it to 128MB memory. That's very important when you are playing games and running multiple applications. Overall I think they could have improved allot but they didn't

  • Reply
  • 2006-03-09 15:00
  • 4fGn
  • U

Such a disappointment. What HP should have done to differentiate this from the 6515w other the WiFi is to give it network coverage for UMTS, add 128MB ROM,128MB RAM Use MicroSD Card (save space and overall memory is cheap these days they should be able to increse it without killing the budget for R & D), Increase processor speed to 512MHz, change to 16M color display, add 2MP camera. I wouldn't mind then to spend the extra $$$ for a complete "mobile" package

  • Reply
  • 2006-03-02 08:13
  • 2GXw
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.