Apple iPad mini review: One for the road
LG Optimus G review: Grand SlamHTC Desire HD - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.3
- Features
-
7.3
- Performance
-
7.1
- rabiul Islam
- Report
- 0
People would not buy HTC DESIRE HD phone because its have no Secondary camera and no TV out. Secondary camera is very important feature for a smart phone also TV out so please look at this matter and take action do believe its competitor of Samsung I9000 galaxy S so fit up it as much better then Samsung galaxy S I love its dimensions, weight, exterior look accept those two complain. Every thing OK, I will buy this cell phone if it will have exist my desire. I love HTC DESIRE HD, I wish the best.
- Reply
- 2010-09-19 10:50
- Lb1a
- U
- Faram
- Report
- 0
4.3 inch screen size and 1230 (MA) battery capacity!!!its awfull...htc desire with 3.7 inch screen size and 1400(MA)bettery capacity is more usefull than it!!!
i think its time for HTC to think about their new products..why dont they release a phone with all new and usefull specs!!!
- Reply
- 2010-09-19 10:26
- 3PXE
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Hey does this is there in India market yet to come. please let me know . specs look perty much kool . whats is price tag in india. i got news saying price ios less then 20k if its true then its value for momey.
- Reply
- 2010-09-19 09:45
- vGtx
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
htc desire using amoled, samsung galaxy s using supoer amoled, now... htc desire hd using tft? wtf....
- Reply
- 2010-09-19 09:40
- tVrF
- U
- Gil
- Report
- 0
> In reply to King Bradley @ 2010-09-19 05:17 from sxvS - click to readYes that's what I told, new processor and new screen hardly increases battery life by 1 or 2 hours. So total 8 to 9 hours. after that its useless. By evening 8 pm run for charger Samsung galaxy with 1500 mAh gives 2 days with moderate use.
- Reply
- 2010-09-19 08:08
- s8c@
- R
- devs
- Report
- 0
sorry for typo...
The conclusion is:
Overall It's NOT NOT NOT better than Galaxy & iPhone 4
- Reply
- 2010-09-19 07:54
- v{MY
- C
- devs
- Report
- 0
Cons:
1. Internal memory - 1.5 GB ? (Galaxy & iPhone give 16 GB)
2. Display needs to improved - In comparison with Super AMOLED of Galaxy & Retina display (640 x 960 pixels) of iPhone.
3. No secondary camera - F**k... doesn't it support video calling???
Pros:
1. 8 MP Camera - better than iPhone & Galaxy
2. 720p HD Vedio recording - Same as iPhone & Galaxy
3. Flash support
Overall better than Galaxy & iPhone 4.
- Reply
- 2010-09-19 07:51
- v{MY
- C
- hi all
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2010-09-18 22:05 from QP{i - click to readNo you are wrong.
When you store files in the phone, the phone will become slower. That's for sure. If you store the files in the memory card, the phone won't slow down, because the files are not in the phone. They are in the memory card, and the phone will only "retrieve" the file from the memory card when you click on it.
- Reply
- 2010-09-19 07:14
- TRKB
- R
- King Bradley
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Gil @ 2010-09-18 22:52 from up1U - click to readI don't think so mate. The new processor of this beast is 45nm QSD8255 so it sucks less power but it gives more speed to the phone and don't forget the SLCD which gives less power consumption. Of course HTC committed their mistake at Desire which resulted to poor battery performance and I personally think they learned their lesson and fixed that issue with this phone.
- Reply
- 2010-09-19 05:17
- sxvS
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
very good phone.... but the Android 3.0 is coming...if you get desire HD and how long going to get 3.0? very very long
to get 3.0.....from HTC....
- Reply
- 2010-09-19 02:37
- ucx9
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
What happened to the Super AMOLED? :( To me, that would make this phone pretty much perfect.
- Reply
- 2010-09-19 00:27
- 0dD6
- U
- brynn
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2010-09-18 22:05 from QP{i - click to readhi all is right internal memory is slow but robust to take many read/writes..External class 2 cards will beat internal memory..Even if they stuffed 64 gig in this thing it would be just a waste,much better using the faster memory cards.
- Reply
- 2010-09-18 23:12
- S3DK
- R
- chocoberry
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Ness @ 2010-09-18 19:21 from p@KD - click to readYou don't even know what you're saying.
Almost every LCD screen for smartphone is TFT.
- Reply
- 2010-09-18 23:07
- EwR5
- R
- Gil
- Report
- 0
With battery 1230 mAh ,this beast will be a BRICK BRICK ,BRICK or STONE by EVENING .EVO 4G with with 1500 mAh wont last more than 9 to 10 hours on moderate use.My friends use to laugh at my HD2 with 1250mAh for twice charging in a day. Slcd and new processor could hardly improve batt life by 1or 2 hours.total 8 to 9 hours of moderate use. After that it will be BRICK OR STONE. RUN RUN RUN FOR CHARGER.
Shame on HTC ,they did it purposely so that we all be compelled to buy their extended or additional batteries.
Htc - money suckers.
Run for charger by evening by 8 pm. All new features will be useless by then.
What do you think Guys ?
- Reply
- 2010-09-18 22:52
- up1U
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to hi all @ 2010-09-18 20:55 from uRIh - click to read
No you are wrong!
Because the iphone has the biggest internal memory, yet it is the fastest. The huger internal memory you have the better. External memory is good of course but internal memory is better for sure.
- Reply
- 2010-09-18 22:05
- QP{i
- R
- repulsive
- Report
- 0
does anybody know what is that little thing at the right edge of the headphone speaker? is it a notification LED or proximity sensor ?
- Reply
- 2010-09-18 20:58
- SuQ{
- Q
- hi all
- Report
- 0
> In reply to mandingo @ 2010-09-18 11:52 from LaNt - click to readThis phone is already very big. If they give it more internal memory, this phone will become a brick.
And do you know that keeping files in external memory makes the phone much more faster than storing it in internal memory? So, to be honest, I personally think that there's no point for having huge internal memory when you already have external memory. Not like you will use up 32GB of external memory.
- Reply
- 2010-09-18 20:55
- uRIh
- R
Login with
Facebook
Google
Sign up