Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.9
- Features
-
6.8
- Performance
-
6.8
- Touch hd2 mini
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Disappointed @ 2010-02-16 02:53 from RNZQ - click to readThis is the most sensible size for a mini of a 4.3" phone. 3.2" is not small while 3.5" is too big to be called a mini.
- Reply
- 2010-02-16 12:05
- x8RG
- R
- Touch hd2 mini
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Disappointed @ 2010-02-16 02:53 from RNZQ - click to readFirst, I feel cool with myself for predicting this as at last week that there will be a mini hd2. yipee:)
My next prediction is working for htc...
- Reply
- 2010-02-16 12:04
- x8RG
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Disappointed @ 2010-02-16 02:53 from RNZQ - click to readthats why it called "HTC Touch HD Mini"
- Reply
- 2010-02-16 10:34
- PAqQ
- R
- Disappointed
- Report
- 0
Dear HTC, Why did you release this in 3.2 inch it is already a crowded market and a shame it is not a 3.5 inch as the 4.3 inch version is too big and this is too small to use full touch benefits!!!
I love your product but once again I have to give it a miss, it is either too big & heavy for the 4.3 or too small to use in this 3.2, marketing should have been sack; as common sense should have apply the screen is too small to use full touch at 3.2 in an already crowded market, WAKE-UP!!!
- Reply
- 2010-02-16 02:53
- RNZQ
- U


Login with
Facebook
Google
Sign up