Nokia 808 PureView in focus: Interview with D. Dinning
Samsung Galaxy S II ICS review: Sugar coatedNokia 6303i classic - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.7
- Features
-
7.6
- Performance
-
7.7
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
nokia makes cellphones for everybody
if based on this new release your putting it down well you better get a iphone quick lol cuz n97 n900 n86 5800 destroy any other phone on the market so if some one dose not care about all that on pre payed for 90$ us you can get a cellphone HAHAHA good job nokia serving people needs apple is creating needs
if you can runn android symbian and linux on a n900 by hacking it your iphone is a toy your nexus is a bigbrother joke and what ever some one complains get the n97 . if your on prepayed 6303. if you have money go buy a n series
- Reply
- 2010-02-05 21:39
- kxxr
- U
- farbror Melker
- Report
- 0
If theres any model that deserves an i-update its the Nokia 6700 classic. I want that useless 2.5mm audiojack replaces with a standard 3.5mm instead. The rest, including symbian S40 could be the same.
Probably never gonna happen. Instead Nokia waste time and energy on above anonymous mediocer phone-model.
- Reply
- 2010-02-05 17:26
- mh5}
- C
- Parag
- Report
- 0
Video: QVGA at 8 fps ! ! !
Why give video facility at all? Save the expense, lower the price.
- Reply
- 2010-02-05 16:55
- upeG
- C
- freack
- Report
- 0
more games, more memory, better videos, more battery time, bluetooth v2.1, did i mention more games? :)
- Reply
- 2010-02-05 14:25
- mAMn
- R
- Shudipto
- Report
- 0
> In reply to xtian @ 2010-02-05 10:18 from uS}r - click to readYes I totaly agree with you.
- Reply
- 2010-02-05 12:51
- uNVA
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
nokia wants to keep market share while SAMSUNG&HTC&SE&MOTO are making powerful phones
- Reply
- 2010-02-05 12:48
- njBb
- C
- Rony
- Report
- 0
Yup its an excellent phone try my page,
http://www.redgage.com/#rf:/bl...xcd-135.html
- Reply
- 2010-02-05 07:58
- up1v
- H
- Serge
- Report
- 0
I don't see anything wrong with this phone. It is a simple upgrade to a popular, very good looking low end device.
It's not supposed to be a pocketable tablet computer with telephone functionality.
- Reply
- 2010-02-05 07:15
- p7{d
- U
- tgm91
- Report
- 0
> In reply to David @ 2010-02-04 17:37 from 2CWr - click to read??? Man, this is the same as Nokia 6303 ... only video performance is very downgraded.... I really don't understand ...
- Reply
- 2010-02-05 00:34
- LaBb
- R
- Somebody123
- Report
- 0
What is the difference between this phone and the original Nokia 6303 in terms of features?
- Reply
- 2010-02-04 17:39
- uH$d
- U
- David
- Report
- 0
This is a lower end mobile. Aimed at people who don't want WiFi, GPS, fancy camera etc. Its made to suit a small budget. And it does that very well. If u want all the fancy stuff then get a more expensive phone as there are plenty to choose from. Prices have dropped consideraly in the past year. Stop complaining about a cheap lower end phone.
- Reply
- 2010-02-04 17:37
- 2CWr
- C
- Sting
- Report
- 0
And Nokia wants to maintain its market share by downgrading even crappy phones ? QVGA@8fps Ah ah ah !
- Reply
- 2010-02-04 17:35
- Mfxf
- U
- Vista
- Report
- 0
Hey guys, for sure dnt see any difference,jst tha intrnal memory! Hey nokia u bettr wake up! Design is nothng we need intrnal system improvement
- Reply
- 2010-02-04 15:57
- fuZU
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
no wlan and no gps. what's the meaning then of the "i" logo?? no change. colours are not a reason to pretend this is a "i" nokia mobile (from "improved"). nokia again and again show us that they are going down. i don't care about their financial report,i want to release new image vectors with 12 mp,hd video,oled touchscreen,gps,wlan and all package. since n95 in 2007 nothing spectacular at nokia since then. what a shame!!!!
- Reply
- 2010-02-04 15:39
- pqya
- U
