Nokia 808 PureView in focus: Interview with D. Dinning
HTC One X review: eXtra specialSamsung S5550 Shark 2 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.9
- Features
-
7.9
- Performance
-
7.8
- Vic
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Vic @ 2010-01-04 20:47 from nq4u - click to readyour condescending man,
- Reply
- 2010-01-05 05:13
- vxt3
- R
- boom.dah
- Report
- 0
Nothing especc, Samsung can do it better...When I saw that new phone is comming I thought it was new suprise from Samsung...Design and specs are low for todays phone standards!
- Reply
- 2010-01-04 22:46
- 390J
- U
- Vic
- Report
- 0
Guys, I'm 100% sure that the mentioned specs are all wrong. It just cant be 137 mm high and 15,5 mm thickness with 2.2' screen. Besides that, there is no WLAN, just 960 mAh battery, 5 Mp camera. It looks like a basic phone with limited functionality and there is no reason to put on AMOLED display. In fact specs are very similar with ones for Nokia 6600i Slide, but Nokia is much more compact device. Just compare: http://www.gsmarena.com/compar...dPhone1=3074
- Reply
- 2010-01-04 20:47
- nq4u
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
2,2 screen is too smal, minimum 2,4 on a slide phone!
- Reply
- 2010-01-04 15:58
- nv6A
- U
- b
- Report
- 0
Its fat, just like the D600 style.
The D900 was ultra thin series.
- Reply
- 2010-01-04 13:19
- 3Jby
- C
- Samsung,Nokia and S
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-12-29 19:51 from wraF - click to readTo me looks like the D520 but whit upgrade and diffrent keyboard.
- Reply
- 2010-01-04 00:28
- mViy
- R
