i-mate JAQ - user opinions and reviews

i-mate

Popularity

Daily interest
0.3%
Total hits:
204046

Voting results

Design
6.1
Features
6.3
Performance
6.4
Votes:
536

It's bulky, all right but also surprisingly light. As for the lack of the camera I'd agree with most who say that an inbuilt camera in a cellphone is more of a nuisance than a benefit...it drains the battery, produces grainy images and is pretty much pointless.

As a business-phone, it needs wi-fi and a more responsive OS. Otherwise it's perfectly fine. The keypad, the touchscreen and the joystick are superb.

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-03 12:38
  • 2S$4
  • U

this is a functional phone. as long as it has bluetooth and infrared, transmission of data would not be a problem. above it all, the os is mobile windows 5.0 which is what interests me most. it also have a functional keypad for easy typing. kudos to the makers

  • Reply
  • 2007-01-02 02:02
  • N7$g
  • U

lag.crash.ugly....

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-04 06:25
  • i0Bc
  • U

This would've been perfect if it included a camera... but as it doesn't I'll go for the SE P990 instead.

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-27 14:19
  • nXEc
  • U

looks like a Blackberry rip-off.

And why the screen is so tiny?

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-23 01:53
  • 45$h
  • U

The upcoming SAMSUNG SGH-I600 makes all competitors literally obselete and pre historic.They are in trouble and already were.This one is also a non seller.

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-21 03:51
  • jIba
  • U

What no wifi? A camera I can live without, but no wifi is inexcusable in todays world of connectivity. Skip this phone and get a Nokia E61, its a much better phone with a much more stable unbloated OS.

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-20 20:03
  • ThHy
  • U

I think, boys shout stay out of business area.
This mobile is meant for business.Business people hate cameras. Generally, Employers likes this kinda mobiles and Employees hate this.
So understand better what to post and where to post.

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-20 16:54
  • iwXA
  • U

Operation part in the key pad is difficult

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-17 12:57
  • PIYw
  • U

Someone finally came out with a business phone WITHOUT camera with Mobile 5.0 .I work in the Development/research area where we are not allowed to carry cameras arround.
Now I can switch to get my E-Mails while I'm on the road.

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-15 07:54
  • 4jWJ
  • U

ugly, i would not carry it for free,
i dunno why they make such products

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-14 04:53
  • mjF@
  • U

I-mate just bulid this phone for their mates who feel pity for this heavy, old tech & ugly phone...

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-13 10:40
  • PFgN
  • U

look at the size of this brick. keys are well placed. could have done wit better processor.

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-13 04:46
  • 2@qy
  • U

Ugly, bulky, no fashion, Bad spec. What else can you ask for? I will pay max of $50 of this phone.

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-13 02:31
  • RxfW
  • U

these are business phones not your latest sony fashion phone and cameras ect are of very little use to your average business man.but i am suprised no wifi which is quite important on a phone like this get a nokia e61 instead though.

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-12 22:34
  • n17x
  • U

What's i-Mate thinking? In a world where high end phones come with camera/video, high end phones like this MUST have those features. I'd definitively buy one if it had those extra features.

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-12 20:35
  • 4vtG
  • U

I dont like it, old technology

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-12 18:42
  • mIny
  • U

Its more like a game pad WITHOUT ANY GAME,
overall its good for nothing

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-12 18:14
  • PTn8
  • U

i am the first man to review and its a fully flop mobile.

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-12 17:36
  • PFI}
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.