Voting results
- Design
-
5.4
- Features
-
5.4
- Performance
-
5.3
- Votes:
- 105
- Hits:
- 58088
Pages: 1
- TEXAS
- Report
well one good point is the reasonable weight not that heavy ONLY 81g. not bad at all.
- Reply
- 2008-11-09 22:33
- bgE%
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
if it's got a mid-low price tag might be worth thinking about
- Reply
- 2008-09-04 11:50
- v0gj
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to LG @ 2008-09-01 18:36 from pW5Su must be a nokia fan because u cant see past your own nose lol
this is a crap phone but go look at the KC91 going to be the best phone of the year that or the innov8 atleast!!
- Reply
- 2008-09-03 16:09
- Mx@E
- R
- VUologist
- Report
Lg should stick to producing more Lg Vu's. The Vu was hot this is not. Create more Vu's!!!
- Reply
- 2008-09-02 23:26
- j3c8
- U
- homie
- Report
hahha.. a cheap n ugly phone exclusively for AT&T customers
- Reply
- 2008-09-02 06:51
- P$@h
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.


RSS feed