LG KE800 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Voting results
- Design
-
8.4
- Features
-
7.7
- Performance
-
7.7
- Votes:
- 2271
- Hits:
- 746467
- Anonymous
- Report
does it have speakerphone as i know the KG800 doesnt and thats one thing i really miss about the phone
- Reply
- 2006-11-03 03:52
- 2CDJ
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
does the key still have that neat design on it? or is it just one colour now
- Reply
- 2006-11-02 21:16
- 4xHD
- U
- azza
- Report
come on guys LG make their phones based on style... not great camers ect... the pone looks great in my opinion... just that chocolate silver plate on the front aint to good...
- Reply
- 2006-11-02 14:12
- Mx@E
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
nokia, producing better looking phones?! AHAHAHAHAHAHA! oh so funny... i needed that good laugh, thanks ;-)
- Reply
- 2006-11-02 07:32
- k8Nt
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
no qvga.... ???
can the guy down here even read??? i think it says pretty legible that it has one and 3mp cam its not a must in a phone.
again if u like taking pictures seriously, a 2mp canon take better pics than any 3mp phone in the market.
- Reply
- 2006-11-02 01:01
- Pu2k
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Regardless of "it is a good phone, a bad phone, no good camera, etc." . The design is simply superb. It really makes you take in consideration this phone, as it teaches a lesson to other manufacturares in matter of looks.
- Reply
- 2006-11-01 18:19
- xutM
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
No QVGA screen
No 3 mega cam
and not even available yet,
where u gonna put samsung unltra D900? or same thickness with better features ultra D830? they are available for quite a long time. And I agree that silver bar with chocolate words are meant to be " only for kid". horrible idea.
I give -ve comment coz i want LG to make better phs.
- Reply
- 2006-11-01 16:23
- PFM7
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
speccs are wrong, the phone is 16,5 mm thick, not 9,9.. wierd that the gsmarena article about it says 16,5 but the speccs 9,9..someones been drinkning
- Reply
- 2006-11-01 16:18
- m}BK
- U
- Faisel
- Report
Looks really good but then again, Nokia will come up with something better, I know that for a fact! LG think they have succeeded but they havent really, Nokia are going to produce better looking fones with super powerful features!
- Reply
- 2006-11-01 15:46
- MMyL
- U
- NokiaMan
- Report
Ha, this is a joke!
Features, total rubbish!
And as for 9.9mm thick!!! I don't think so somehow!
This phone seriously is for the weak hearted.
- Reply
- 2006-11-01 14:59
- m5Si
- U
- daniel conifer
- Report
i know what will be in my dreams tonight!!! move over sarah you have competition
- Reply
- 2006-11-01 14:22
- i2m$
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Who said samsung phones are not good in term of quality? Personally, I think they are reliable and stylish. However, I dont know the reliability of LG phones.. coz I heard that it's really bad.. :P
- Reply
- 2006-11-01 13:50
- PWD9
- U
- big raz
- Report
over rated, over priced, over advertised, this phone is like a catchy song thats played to much on the radio! baby cakes you just don't know! how much i! i hate this phone!
- Reply
- 2006-11-01 11:51
- MF{P
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
That silly silver band with "Chocolate" engraved spoils the entire image... Yuck... No self-respecting guy would carry this phone now.
- Reply
- 2006-11-01 08:36
- P$99
- U
- Kevin
- Report
hmm...very thin...but i don't like the silver bar thing with the Chocolate thing engraved...overall...ok phone...
- Reply
- 2006-11-01 08:34
- im45
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
when will this be released? i really dont think they should sell it at more than 380 euro, going over would be a bad idea. LG is the only brand that dares to sell solely on design. Even samsung is forced to push down their price, cuz their quality isnt the best
- Reply
- 2006-11-01 06:13
- xpdX
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed