Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.0
- Features
-
7.4
- Performance
-
7.3
- dani
- Report
I think this isnt really that good the samsung E900 is better!! is has more memory and more things on it, and is cheaper!
- Reply
- 2006-10-28 18:34
- nU1S
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
can anyone tell me if this phone has playlists for the songs?
- Reply
- 2006-10-28 08:46
- RNWR
- U
- bear
- Report
hey can you buy memory for this type of phone ??? and for the other kg800 are they both the choclate phones ?? if you can buy memory how much can you buy ???
- Reply
- 2006-10-28 06:29
- U2Qd
- U
- carmen el.
- Report
this phone is fantastic!
http://www.tecnozoom.it/cellul...g-ku800.html
- Reply
- 2006-10-27 15:36
- iBWs
- U
- The - Black - Moon
- Report
im acually don't know what to do some of you guys said the LG KU800 is great & amazing and some of you said it's rabbish so what i can do & the other say E900 is better.
And i want to know what about the sound & the camera ?
- Reply
- 2006-10-27 14:07
- iFr4
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
The numeric keypad has been made smaller on the LG KU800 compared to the KG800. It's a bad choice since it makes the bottom half of the phone now looks slightly out of proportion to the top half when phone is slid open. Isn't design supposed to be this phones strong point LG? It was an unessasery change on a design phone, beacuse that's what it is...still.
- Reply
- 2006-10-27 11:22
- mTRG
- U
- audi q7
- Report
This phone has chic and futuristic looks with elegant and sophisticated design. Its mirror-like blacky looks makes it a distinct coveted slide phone. What a beauty!
- Reply
- 2006-10-27 07:40
- ijs{
- U
- Black is cool
- Report
LG should dub this phone as "Black Ice" instead of "Chocolate" because of its shining and crystal blacky look. Cooooooooool phone! I am falling in love with you!!
- Reply
- 2006-10-27 06:01
- ijs{
- U
- pink hairy bananas
- Report
the reason why i said motorola's design suck because of the RAZR MAXX and RAZR V3XX (especially the ROKR E2). don't you feel they are extremely ugly? who on earth will carry a phone embedded with a dragon (whatever it is) unless a little brat. let alone the features, ku800/kg800 is the best design ever and there is no plastic feel. hold it and you will find it so elegant. I guarantee there is no other phones will attract your interest anymore!
- Reply
- 2006-10-27 05:50
- ijs{
- U
- Gautam Juneja
- Report
It's a beautiful phone with ravishing looks. Though i have not used it yet but i believe that it would be great to have this handset and i'll very soon buy it.
- Reply
- 2006-10-26 08:16
- PxxB
- U
- Motorola Police
- Report
motorola's design is sucky nowadays? the RAZR maxx looks ten times better than this with HSDPA (instead of slow old 384kbps UMTS), a QVGA screen, EDGE Class 10 and Bluetooth 2.0 while being about 2-3mm thinner.
LG didn't even bother changing the design in any way. at least moto came with a different design when they made their UMTS RAZR, the V3x. LG is the one with sucky design.
and this phone is just as plasticky as any nokia.
- Reply
- 2006-10-26 04:28
- x$VS
- U
- pink hairy bananas
- Report
motorola's design is sucking nowadays. Nokia is well-known of its plastic look...people it's time for a change and enhance your sense of taste by using LG. we don't need useless fancy features as the main purpose of carrying a handphone is for calling...
- Reply
- 2006-10-23 11:55
- ijsq
- U
- andy
- Report
its ok no snooze, and not much fetures, you suck i regrated buying this phone i think you all should stop making this model.. and may be replace it by selling coffie. ..
- Reply
- 2006-10-22 18:11
- PvW1
- U
- Cellphone Genius
- Report
this phone is pretty decent. Better than last chocolate phone because of camera and a few more options that most of you guys might not need vitally. The screen quality is not the best. But the sound quality for the speakers are going to be AMAZING. 72 polypony is only out for a FEW phones. In korea, that's a different story. The e900 is still better because of the screen quality. Don't say e900 copied because the touch buttons are better made and configured.
- Reply
- 2006-10-22 12:29
- ntIK
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
it seems like if the samsung e900 copyed yhe lg kg800. But that's not true. samsung had touch sensitive but did'nt came out with it first
- Reply
- 2006-10-21 22:14
- mbyX
- U
- RubberyLover
- Report
This is a better effort by LG, they got wooped when Samsung brought out the E900, but they have added the all important memory card support and 3G, which the E900 does not have. But still, the firmware is awkward, and the LG make is highly unreliable.
To all the moaners below, LG do have their followers, and this phone WILL attract people to Voda.
- Reply
- 2006-10-21 18:48
- iIR0
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.


RSS feed