Motorola Aura - user opinions and reviews

Motorola

Popularity

Daily interest
0.1%
Total hits:
734393

Voting results

Design
8.2
Features
7.3
Performance
7.5
Votes:
2756


Sort by:

It's quite a difference between "don't think" and actually having the phone in the hand. As I told you before both glasses are crystal sapphire. I am using it for 8 months. The only damage it suffered is the one in the photos.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-02 21:59
  • 3c1n
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-01 00:50 from 3c1H - click to readI dont think thats is the seame glaas like front,and antena cover is plastic,and i think the rear glas is plastic.please answer somewone!schratch on your phone is bicouse your bleade open display is not in center,i seleng original aura phone on black market from about 10 models 1 have bad hausin center.sory for my bad englase.please put 2 pictures of your phone when batery is out left plastic side and rear captured from behinde.please!and thank you.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-02 00:25
  • SH{T
  • R

this is realyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesssss­t
luxury phone at wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooorld

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-01 14:24
  • Mfxm
  • U

The rear cover the one where you can see the cogs is of crystal sapphire not scratch-able the same as the front screen glass. The only plastic part I think is the one that got damaged in the photos I mentioned in the previous comment.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-01 00:50
  • 3c1H
  • R

Is the rear gear cover glas or plastic???

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-30 18:41
  • 0x76
  • Q

See how it gets after 8 months of use :(

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5...p9281143.jpg
http://img269.imageshack.us/im...p9281144.jpg
http://img17.imageshack.us/img...p9281145.jpg
http://img34.imageshack.us/img...p9281147.jpg

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-30 15:50
  • 3c1H
  • H

STFU SymbianKing !!!

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-23 18:57
  • jEXh
  • U

how nice. 7yrs later they release the upgrade version of the v70.

fugly.

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-22 09:05
  • IaHM
  • U

this phone is for nuts cant believe? :D




Symbian Rulezzzz!!

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-17 00:50
  • RBAN
  • U

good quality...competitive...

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-15 10:13
  • wc7c
  • C

i don't think motorols is such a useless one try my model moto rokr e8 yeah it is very good u csn reply me if u csnnot fing sny festures in mine......................

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-11 22:30
  • PAYh
  • U

Very, very nice display... OLED display.

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-11 08:05
  • 8PeV
  • C

aura is realy BEAUTIFUL
im realy on WONDER why design vote 8.2 ???!!!!!

design is #10 from 10

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-10 15:46
  • Sbg{
  • C

y it cost more Rs 87,200 /- in india

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-03 06:26
  • utsS
  • U

Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-28 11:29
  • TRZp
  • C

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-08-23 07:07 from ibbx - click to readyou have right, this is a very ugly phone, for a very expensive price!The tecnical featuring is a middle suite.Y nto found nothig famuos in this phone!

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-27 19:57
  • pk%4
  • R

> In reply to david13 @ 2009-08-20 18:29 from M3s@ - click to readIf Motorola go back to the drawing board and come up with similar designs, likes of Nokia, Samsungs and Sony Erricson etc., then that's not Motorola anymore!?

Motorola phones are unique

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-25 00:45
  • UisK
  • R

One word. Ugly. It's been getting terrible reviews from all over. On the design front, not everyone thinks it looks stunning, in fact most people who have spoken of it think its ugly. It has virtually zero features compared to other phones available in the market today.

So the big question is this: What were they thinking?

"Lets make the Aura a shiny piece of stainless steel turd and give it a hefty price tag of $2000 so people will buy it in this credit crunch."

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-23 07:07
  • ibbx
  • U

I find it amusing... and a little sad that people are openly admitting that they'd buy this overpriced gimmick if they had the money.

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-22 14:01
  • iiap
  • U

Motorola are the under performers when it comes to the mobile market. They try to be different with their silly design but do not understand their market or the compitition. Motorola need to go back to the drawing board and come up with similar designs, likes of Nokia, Samsungs and Sony Erricson etc.

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-20 18:29
  • M3s@
  • U

Sort by:
Total of 953 user reviews and opinions for Motorola Aura.