Motorola C168 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.4
- Features
-
7.0
- Performance
-
7.2
- Anonymous
- Report
It you want a mobile (heaven forbid) to talk on, this C168 is a small cheap phone that has great battery life, what more do your really NEED!
- Reply
- 2006-02-17 05:37
- xgx9
- U
- thanveer
- Report
that was my mind blowing thing
in low price i got a good mobile,when compared to LG & NOKIA.
- Reply
- 2006-02-10 13:42
- iwXx
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Comparing to Nokia 3120, it is more worth buying. It is more slim, and more it has FM radio. It is easy to use too.
- Reply
- 2006-02-09 07:01
- TVW%
- U
- MeMobile
- Report
This phone is rubbish. It is basic bland and I can see why it is only $99 dollars. Personally if you want this phone you would be better off to go the Nokia 3120. Same price and easier to use.
- Reply
- 2006-02-07 05:30
- PMTH
- U
- Gaurav
- Report
Superb Phone and suites everyones pocket with FM, 250 SMS, 600 Phone Entry, Very Loud Polyphonic Ringtone. All in all Great Phone.
- Reply
- 2006-02-02 14:22
- PFS0
- U
- Fat
- Report
It's so nice & light.
Very loud ringtone, you won't miss any call. Fonts is big and it's good.
- Reply
- 2005-12-25 06:16
- UGrx
- U
- dolphin
- Report
It looks like a good model for me.When does it reach the market? I can hardly wait.
- Reply
- 2005-11-20 01:52
- TBZ6
- U
- byvz
- Report
Although you can see a camera shortcut on picture , this is wrong. This phone does not capture photos or videos..
- Reply
- 2005-11-16 09:59
- Tkd3
- U
- kt
- Report
overall this is pretty nice entry level phone . however no mini usb as c380 or c650 ... and no details on how much the spcace avaible on the strage for picture files can download trough WAP/ GPRS
- Reply
- 2005-10-07 13:48
- TKby
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed