Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.4
- Features
-
5.8
- Performance
-
6.2
| General | 2G Network | GSM 900 / 1800 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2003, 3Q | |
| Status | Discontinued |
| Size | Dimensions | 105 x 44 x 20 mm, 70 cc |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 84 g |
| Display | Type | Monochrome graphic |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 98 x 64 pixels, 5 lines | |
| - Screensavers |
| Sound | Alert types | Vibration; Downloadable monophonic ringtones |
|---|---|---|
| Speakerphone | No |
| Memory | Phonebook | 100 |
|---|---|---|
| Call records | 10 dialed, 10 received, 10 missed calls | |
| Card slot | No |
| Data | GPRS | No |
|---|---|---|
| HSCSD | No | |
| EDGE | No | |
| 3G | No | |
| WLAN | No | |
| Bluetooth | No | |
| Infrared port | No | |
| USB |
| Camera | No |
|---|
| Features | Messaging | SMS |
|---|---|---|
| Browser | WAP 1.1 | |
| Radio | No | |
| Clock | Yes | |
| Alarm | Yes | |
| Games | 3 - Snake, Box World, 5 Stones | |
| Colors | 3 - White, Blue, Green | |
| GPS | No | |
| Java | No | |
| - T9 - Currency converter - Calculator |
| Battery | Standard, Li-Ion 700 mAh (BA240) | |
|---|---|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 192 h | |
| Talk time | Up to 6 h |
Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more
Motorola C200 - user opinions and reviews
- Anonymous
Battery backup is excellent,i have been using it since last 4 years,it is best for those who believe that phones are nothing more than calling devices..
- Reply
- 2009-08-22 21:44
- utmk
- H
- Makarious
i firstly used this fone in 2003,ts durable but ts good only for sms and texting-t has very weak scratchable key pads,no ringtones for delivery reports on sms all in all i can say t was bad as many motorola brands used to be very bad idea...
- Reply
- 2009-04-06 22:59
- fu$c
- U
- Solid
This phone has very little above texting and calling, a few crap games and a green screen. The discrete buttons are easy to use, the screens easy on the eyes, build quality is great (mine has survived a motorcycle crash and a swim in a bag of cocacol...
- Reply
- 2008-05-10 01:37
- PTcF
- U


RSS feed