Motorola C350 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.8
- Features
-
7.3
- Performance
-
7.4
- tim
- Report
had this phone for 4 years now and its nice
but tommorow ill upgrade my cell
to k530i or w910i
btw its very nice and compact
- Reply
- 2008-01-09 14:03
- 0@jG
- U
- Jorge
- Report
I´ve had this phone for over 4 years now, and its awesome, its so cute and small, i love it, but hey, you cant ask much from this phone, its an oldie, the features are standard.
- Reply
- 2007-09-04 15:56
- EMEH
- U
- Shashika
- Report
i am using this phone 6 years.But its not good @ all.Not bad as well.An in every moto c350 there is a problem with the yer piece.when your out you cant hear any thing.
- Reply
- 2007-07-26 09:50
- w9LC
- U
- reed
- Report
this phone is like any motorola.I put on c350 new software(monsterpack) and is a preety phone...you can use USB and upload mid's ang gif's...;) redd_bt@yahoo.com
- Reply
- 2007-07-16 05:15
- p3yc
- U
- Sherif
- Report
i had this phone from 4 years it is a very bad phone, i through it out after just 9 months from the date of purchasing it, its tooooooooo slow , recieve sms after thousand year , ring tones are of very low volume , no alarm , really i never so a phone clumzy as that phone
- Reply
- 2007-07-06 13:54
- n9jI
- U
- rebung
- Report
this is my 2nd phone. i use it since 2004 till now. it wrecked & hundred times fall down thrown by my todler. since it too old, i left it in my drawer till i got problem using bluetooth phone connecting wireless internet. then i remember my old c350, using USB data cable, i can surf freely with my lap top. thank god it works well.
- Reply
- 2007-05-19 17:47
- PSPr
- U
- Rodrigo
- Report
This was my first mobile phone. And I really hatted it. Bad reception, worse battery, the campaign is not loud enough, and it has to alarm. I never saw a phone without a alarm. For now on it's just Nokia or Samsung for me.
- Reply
- 2007-04-23 22:55
- P4cr
- U
- ajay
- Report
this was one of the best fooling mobile created by motorola. the only thing was good that it was cheaper in colour display mobiles. Reception was very poor and today i threw it into the river to get good sleep rather than worrying reception of my phone...bye moto
- Reply
- 2007-01-11 09:04
- iwrE
- U
- walid
- Report
At first i reaLLy liked the mobile for its size ,attractive casings but within one year my battery as well as the screen started cause problems......
- Reply
- 2006-11-28 10:29
- N9VW
- U
- cv
- Report
I hav been usin this for more than 2 years. Batter life is terrible. For me its less than 24 hrs with less than 10 mins talk.Key pad is so hard to press. Reception is bad.No java.Menu is slow. it takes too much start up time.No alarm which works when the fone is off.masseging is so difficult given the keypad design.If you copy phone book entries to the SIM or vice versa the pone book will show you both repeating the same name which is quite harrasing.Takes too long to get fully charged. Very low resolution & small screen.Phone is heavy given its class.
The only good thing i see that it has a good wap browser and GPRS class 8. So dont buy this fone go for a SE or Nokia!
- Reply
- 2006-11-12 21:59
- PDPU
- U
- kamau
- Report
it was a nice,cute phone at first but now after an year,the earpiece doesnt work,the network reception is low and the procedure for sending sms is too long!
- Reply
- 2006-11-01 08:56
- i55P
- U
- senty
- Report
my humble request please dont buy this mobile that's all cheat , i really sufferred a lot after buying this mobile really i fed about the mobiles after using this bloody mobile, i tried to sale this thing but nobody came forward to get it free also,, every thing is problem in this
- Reply
- 2006-10-18 18:04
- PTne
- U
- pee
- Report
whats the use of that reset button under the 4n's keypad?Good 4n though.However sometime during the menu navigating it simply blinks and displays "no service" or even turns off!Wassup
- Reply
- 2006-10-05 11:18
- Rn5X
- U
- sunnie
- Report
I loved this phone. It's very tiny and cute. After about six months of having this phone call quality went down the hill. I had to squeeze the phone together in order to hear the person I was trying to talk to. It was pretty cheap though when I bought it. If I had known how long it was going to last me, I would have dished out more cash for a quality phone.
- Reply
- 2006-08-28 00:32
- kM55
- U
- Lincoln Brown
- Report
Well as a mobile browser the c350 has come up somewhat short, however it more than makes up for this shortcoming as an internet modem. Congratulations to Motorola on a job well done.
- Reply
- 2006-08-18 05:31
- Re2Z
- U
- mizael
- Report
good phone for cheap price, besides you can download midi tones and wallpapers from the PC to the phone with miniUSB cable, only need the software.
- Reply
- 2006-07-31 14:27
- P1{v
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed