Motorola C380/C385 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.9
- Features
-
7.8
- Performance
-
7.9
- Cajun
- Report
Focus,people, focus!;)This is announced to be a BUDGET phone: approximitely 120 dollars/euros without a subsidy! It targets to be a very usable, simple but modern phone. 65k colors, poly tones, usb-port, speaker and Quadband. If you just want a phone to call with (anywhere), but with nice basic feats it suffices. Nice phone foy ye old folks ;)
- Reply
- 2004-04-14 01:11
- U
- demencia
- Report
no infrared,no camera,only 24channel,no voice record... i think c650 is better! Only its desing sux...a little
- Reply
- 2004-04-13 16:25
- U
- Demencia
- Report
Well i think the phone is... GOOD! not great-Good! Because its 2004s phone and a lot of functions are missing-camera(not so worring `bout it),i-port,specialy the memory-God just 1.5MB? And finaly-it is only 20channelz tone:( If we r talking about functions-definatly C650! but for desing...
- Reply
- 2004-04-13 14:13
- U
- din
- Report
i really hate this phone! u know why? because i think they lie me. i almost give up because this phone has nothing. Although it's a colour phone but the usage is bad
- Reply
- 2004-04-12 04:41
- U
- Raziel
- Report
It is a great looking phone. I think
that this is going to be my next motorola.
- Reply
- 2004-04-02 06:36
- U
- isa
- Report
it is similar to samsung x100 but it has additional features(voice record, voice dialing) but memory 1.5mb(not bad).
and its shape more beautiful...
it suites me alot too:))
- Reply
- 2004-03-28 14:36
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
oh my god... dam nice lookin phone! its a design im lookin 4. it suites me alot. love urban modern style. love,love,love it!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Reply
- 2004-03-23 16:17
- U
- Cajun
- Report
A telephone without a lot of functions I think are necessary (come on: neither bluetooth nor infrared?)....but:) This seems like an ideal phone for people who want to keep it really simple and want to be reachable at anytime(Quadband). An ideal phone for my dad.:D
- Reply
- 2004-03-14 01:41
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed