Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.5
- Features
-
7.6
- Performance
-
7.7
- Darren
- Report
- 0
I cant believe you lot of moaning sods! U want a cheap phone (correct me if Im wrong) this phone is £45!!!! U dont get anything for nothing, u should know that! I have one of these, was a xmas present, Im generally pleased with it except one thing, If u make video calls its difficult to see the screen as u have to tilt the phone to get into shot of the camera and the screen completely looses its brightness at this angle! Other than that £45 with £15 airtime, its still a bargain!!!!!!!
- Reply
- 2005-01-04 14:46
- Mt2S
- U
- thinakaran
- Report
- 0
where got infra red port and there is no bluetooth also. please make sure that ypur information is true next time
- Reply
- 2005-01-04 10:47
- PUiy
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
This phone ends up costing nearly £100 unless you already have a 128mb Trans Flash memory card which is at least £20 and then you have to buy the cable connecting the phone to the PC with the driver which is at least £30. So it ends up costing about £95 which you wouldnt expect to pay. I couldnt really find any pro's on this phone except the misleading price, the triband feature and the option of swithching to the front and rear cameras on video capture and taking a photo. There are alot of cons. Firstly, no where in the manual or was it advertised it said you have to buy the cable and driver separetly unlike it did with the memory. 128mb is the max you can get which really wont last that long if you save alot of hi-res pics and mp3's. Video capture is only 9 seconds which i suppose most phones do at the moment. The stiff joystick starts to hurt your thumb if you use it too much. The weight and thickness is massive but it does have an mp3 player and camera in it. Texting is annoying. You can't turn on delivery reports. With regards to some questions. it doesnt have an infa red port. Like I said video is 9 seconds which isnt enough time to record something. I got this phone yesterday and it is going back ASAP. In my opinion if you dont want a contract but a decent pay as you go phone on the 3 network then you will have to wait longer. The LG U8120 is at least £150 on pay as you go which is alot. Get the Sony Ericsson Z1010 or any other Sony phones as there all good or get the Nokia 6820 or 6610i which is only £99 on O2 and it is a good easy to use phone with good features. P.S. I will never get a Motorola phone again.
- Reply
- 2004-12-31 20:50
- myjn
- U
- dre
- Report
- 0
the motorola c975 is good but is missing bluetooth it is a little bit better than the moto a985 but it needs a memory card to get the full out of it
- Reply
- 2004-12-30 22:16
- myk9
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
It sucks!! why cant they understand who is going to buy there Products!! they suck Sonyericcson RULES
- Reply
- 2004-12-30 19:32
- myjn
- U
- twinny 2
- Report
- 0
I think tat dis is the best phone ever it has everyin you could want on it and more!! it also comes with loads of free stuff. ppl who are sayin that it is crap are only sayin that coz they cant afford one themselves!!! (bad taste!!!!)nokia and samsung n all that other stuff are crap!!!
- Reply
- 2004-12-30 02:16
- m79y
- U
- lucy
- Report
- 0
I am unable to delete a message and it's not allowing me to view video messages in my inbox can anyone shed some light on this problem?
- Reply
- 2004-12-29 11:26
- mXDU
- U
- Katherine
- Report
- 0
This Phone absolutely SUCKS. I cant believe some people are saying its good (1/100 lol). The vga camera sucks, the reception is always weak, the wap is sloe and the mp3 player has low sound quality. I had it for 3 days, thought I'd make the most of it b4 taking it back, so I tried unlocking it, but IT CANT BE UNLOCKED. If you still have the reciept, take it back - Get a sharp or a Nokia.
- Reply
- 2004-12-29 10:53
- myjn
- U
- phoebe
- Report
- 0
lyk this fone ---however its slightly confusing =S they say you get lots of 'free things' but dont fully explain it ! i think overall its really fun and once ive got all the add ons it will be the best !!! thanx
- Reply
- 2004-12-28 20:24
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
brick brick brick brick brick. motorola should of done better
- Reply
- 2004-12-28 13:33
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Agree with 99% of these opinions. Motorola have manufatured a phone to compete with Nokia, but are ending up having trouble with sendo. This phone bites. I cant believ the fearures are a rip off. No bluetooth, not stylish, slow internet, and not unlockable. Why wud ne1 buy it? Because its price is misleading. I am taking min back. My advice, get a Sony erriccsen or nokia
- Reply
- 2004-12-28 13:00
- U
- arsenal4life
- Report
- 0
i think this phone is awesome! the net is really fast and the camara is great.i love it!
- Reply
- 2004-12-28 00:38
- U
- Graham
- Report
- 0
I know motorola, and usually they make very good phones. this one is the exception. Dont take it out on Moto, its just this handset that needs to go
- Reply
- 2004-12-27 21:10
- U

