Motorola C975 - user opinions and reviews

Motorola

Check Price

Popularity

Daily interest
  N/A
Total hits:
461042

Voting results

Design
7.5
Features
7.6
Performance
7.7
Votes:
2159


Sort by:

Not happy with the phone. Thought more from Motorola. If you desperately want a motorola, then go for v600, it is typical motorola (good), but the c975 is totally more complex and weaker in featues!

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-24 18:23
  • U

I ahv this phone and 7250i, and the noki is better despite having not as many features as the moto. This is because the screen resolution, the size, weight and gprs modem of the phones. Motorola cannot compete with nokia on any basis

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-24 10:56
  • U

Cannot believe the low profile of this phone. GPRS IS SLOE, AND VGA CAMERA IS VERY WEAK. Also the resloution sucks, and the delicacy of the phone, its like handling an egg. Had it for 2 days, got it cheap so thinking over taking it back.

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-24 10:55
  • U

'Fraid Not for cheap. It will cost you round £200 now because CPW stopped doin the deal. The Nokai 7600 is a very good handset (I got it on contract) - i am with all the reviews here, the motorola c975 is motorolas worst handset yet. Guess the price of the phone was really too good to be true!!!

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-23 14:58
  • U

My son got it for me, and I am not at all happy with it, i've asked him to exchange it for the nec616v. I hear that is a decent phone. I really dont like the navigation or the feature quality 0on this Motorola, can I still get the Nokai 7600

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-23 14:48
  • U

Cannot believe the features on this phone are sooooooo baaad. The way they appear on websites under 'specification' is so fooling. When you try the phone, then you see what a wreck it is. Motorolas worst handset by far.

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-23 14:46
  • U

Phones price fooled me, I sohould not have bought it. My advice, dont be fooled!! Go for a NOKIA or SONY ERRICSEN. Features are whack and size is humongous

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-23 14:41
  • U

Very Heavy, and big, feature wise, I was fooled. The phones features are not very good, the wap is slow loading and how can a phone be made qwithout Bluetooth

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-23 14:35
  • U

i have just got this mobile and i have had to take it back because it is constantly coming up with no signal. the phone features are amazing and i do recomend this phone! i am hoping that the signal problem isnt to do with the make of the phone and i am hoping it was just a one-off. I am exchanging it for a new one! i got it from woolworths for £44.99 with £15 airtime included in it! I got this phone on 3 network and its pay as you go. The only bad thing that i would say about this phone is that when you go on pay as you go your credit expires after 30 days so you have to top it up every 30 days. The least amount of money on a top up voucher is £15 so if you do not use all of this you will loose out on money! over all i give this phone 8/10

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-23 13:27
  • U

Defiently the Nokai 7600 is much better in all its features. PS. Try loading the GPRS WAP on the motorola, it takes soooooooo looooong. Very dissapointed with the Motorola

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-22 11:18
  • U

I was told by the store clerk that this and the Nokia 7600 are the best phones at the moment. I purchased the Motorola because they were not selling the Nokia 7600. I am returning it. The Navigation is all wrong. Te Phone weighs a ton. The phone also is not loud and the scree resolution absolutely SUCKS. I've have not tried a Nkai 7600 yet. Is it any Good?

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-22 11:17
  • U

I'm bored of it now. And I've only had it for 2a week. I think the camera is OK, BUT EVERYTHING ELE SUCKS. Firstly My PC wont pick up the phone. The VGA IS SO SHITE!! The mp3 player is not even loud and the weight, its like I am at the Gym.

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-22 11:15
  • U

My sister purchased this phone. I personally think it Reaks, the sound quality it very weak, it has not got changeable faces, I've read that the Camera lens is easily damaged, and all round, my sister dislikes the phone aswell. Take my Advice, Sony Erriccsenmn t610 is muchj better. OK So all the features is not there but Sony has the BLUETOOTH TECHNOLOGY. Motorola Does not. How can you manufacture a phone these days, without BLUETOOTH. IT IS WHACK!!!

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-22 11:13
  • U

I cant believe how crap this phone is. I've had it for a month now and also purchased a Nokia. Comparing the two, motorola have the same features (some less)but Nokia's features are much better, A LOT BETTER, I a changing my Contract Handset ASAP!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-22 11:11
  • U

Holy crap, what is this, the Anti-Motorola Squad or something?

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-21 19:30
  • U

This fone weighs a TONNE, does not look like a modern phone, and battery life SUCKS

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-21 12:26
  • U

i advise you not to purchase this phone. dont let the cheap price take you for a mug. it is easily the worst phone i have owned and pleae note: i am certain this phone cant be locked so if you are not willing t have to purchase £15 credit every 180 days at least (or the sim is blocked) then stay away from ther motorola c975!!!

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-21 12:18
  • U

This Phone is an absolute shamble. I've owned it for 2 months and had so many problems with it. First I buy the phone and it is difficult to use, plus the features are not up to scratch, and the vga camera is weak.Then I find out it has no Bluetooth and no IR port. Then I purchaase the software for it and it does not identify my phone. And lastly I buy the Memory Card (The phone, when purchased has 8 MB, so a Memory Card is required), and there is no pojt because sometimes, the phones states 'Svae not accessed/Moved file not accessible' It is a right shamble, and I need a new phone. Anyone selling a Nokia or a Sharp Cheap. They're the only Phones I have no Problem with!

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-21 12:16
  • U

i got the c975 for 30 quid + 15 quid top up on 3pay, my a835 after sitting in a full sink, then covered in beer and then coffee and finaly skidded on it as it fell out of pocket and died, so got a c975, the data cable from the a835 fits, got phone tools programe update for it for free on web, apart from crap camera and weak ringtones and rear cover it works well, size is ok, much smaller than a835, screen is good as is reception sound, i have put a contract sim in and will sell other with 15 quid on so for 30 quid i am happy.
got 128mb card for a tenner so even better now

quote mobile man " P.S. I will never get a Motorola phone again." thats what i said a few years ago, but have had a couple over the last 10 months and the wife has a moto clamshell which is 3 years old but she is happy with it and it has never gone wrong, so keep an open mind as you never know you might end up eating your words

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-21 02:15
  • U

I owned it for 2 days and took great care of. on the second day I took it out my pocket to find its screen was cracked. VERY DELICATE, UNRELIABLE AND FEATURES ARE WHACK

  • Reply
  • 2004-12-20 18:19
  • U

Sort by:
Total of 661 user reviews and opinions for Motorola C975.