overlock, 11 Sep 2011how do u overlock DEFY?Step 1: Root your phone, in example by downloading and launching 'Universal Androot'.
Step 2: Install a superuser app, like 'Superuser permission'.
Step 3: With original DEFY, download 'Milestone overclock'. This works for Milestone, FlipOut and DEFY among others using same CPU on stock ROM.
All in all it should be done in about 2-3 minutes.
Hi my self rajeev, i very much like the motorala defy & newer version defy+. But i dont undetstand that why motorala design team forget to design Front camera. This is 3G phone & it do not hve fron camera. What is the logic behind it ?????
Atlist i was thinking defy will come with front camera but still missing guysssss
goron, 06 Sep 2011it will die shortly if defy+ still have the same locked bootloader like moto defy. so the real... more@goron:
I am a proud owner of Defy. The XDA folks rooted and found an innovative 2nd-init which can now cause the defy to load any Android ROM optimized for Defy. I am running SM7 stable ROM, gettinh more than 1.5 days of battery with heavy usage and very fluid non crashing android system.
The official page of Motorola Defy+ link below
tbege, 09 Sep 2011If you look more carefully, the Defy+ has a better configuration, the screen is bigger with a ... morethey almost have the same specs. defy + is gigerbread by default. while defy is only froyo. but you can mod it to gingerbread. and procesore speed.. and by the way screen is the same at 3.7,...
dc221, 08 Sep 2011Still se active will be a better choice. Active is better than defy+ coz has bravia engine, h... moreIf you look more carefully, the Defy+ has a better configuration, the screen is bigger with a better resolution (480x854 vs. 320x480, respectively 3.7" vs. 3.0"), and let's admit it, a 3" screen is just not enough for most people... True, the processor has the same frequency, it's true, same RAM, but the Defy+ has 2GB of internal memory, while the Active has 1, from which only about 350MB is accessible to the user. Also, don't tell me, you so desperately need that front-camera or the 720p recording... The Defy+ is also IP67 certified, while as far as I know, the SE isn't.
Dear Motorola Company :
What is the difference between this and Defy ??
i can make my Defy overlocked to 1Ghz and i can upgrade it to 2.3 Android..so this phone is ridiculous.. and no Secondary Cam... WHAT A SHAME !.. lol Motorola , u disappointed me.. :(
dc221, 08 Sep 2011Still se active will be a better choice. Active is better than defy+ coz has bravia engine, h... moreBut it has a weak battery, only 1200mAh. Defy+ has 1700mAh. and it's a brick, 16,5mm thick.
defy+ is better than crappy symbian N8 except camera..a real killer
tas1020, 07 Sep 2011Also you are forgeting the Google-Motorola deal ;)Still se active will be a better choice.
Active is better than defy+ coz has bravia engine, hd video rec, front camera,wet finger tracking, xloud technology, barometric pressure sensor ,A.N.T+, pedometer,timescape ui,etc that defy/defy + doesn't have. Gingerbread runs flawless on 3" with 1GHz processor.
All the xperia lineup of 2011(including active) will get 2.3.4 update and then 4.0 update which will include new additional features such as usb on the go,Sony 3D sweep panorama for the camera, even better Facebook integration, Swype-like text input (T9 Trace), integrated screen capture, video chats via Google Talk and more,various NFC options, Xbox Kinect-like feature called Virtual Camera Operator, USB hub support,etc(http://www.gsmarena.com/androi...ws-3106.php)
zakster, 06 Sep 2011so youre saying this phone isnt worth it? cause i am in a confused state.. i am never carefull... moreI think the xcover doesn't come close to the defy+, the specs are way lower. even if it's cheaper you could just get the old defy and still get a better device.
the xcover is a joke
Can Motorola suport AIR run time. can we run application which was developed in Flash builder 4.5
goron, 06 Sep 2011it will die shortly if defy+ still have the same locked bootloader like moto defy. so the real... moreso youre saying this phone isnt worth it? cause i am in a confused state.. i am never carefull of anything. a phone like this may save me some cash:).. but seriously.. should i wait for samsung xcover or should i look into this.. i mean even in the future i shouldnt be stuck.. now that you mention of the locked bootloader!.. as you said.. the other day i went to the stores to see defy. it was still on android 2.1 with i think red lens! and many people are telling me that moto customer support is horrendous.. which one should i go for????? in android!!
My only and biggest hope is that battery of this one will last longer, the old one is hardly staying awake about 7 hours if I don't use it too much! :(
zakster, 04 Sep 2011i read that defy+ is getting 720p recording..so i believe moto did the right job by getting th... moreit will die shortly if defy+ still have the same locked bootloader like moto defy. so the real problem its in motorola it self. and dont forget moto always lag behind when distribute their phone,the 1st defy was released at september last year and start to sell at my country at may, people already bought ACE/gio/fit/wildfire 2 at that time.the problem is motorola it self.
samsung xcover is in pre-production mode when gsma test it so it too soon to judge it.
i dont want to comment for active cause i'm very disapointed with my last SE android phone, SE have same problem with moto, locked bootloader.
it is really funny watching how samsung and HTC grow their famous on android land with unlocked bootloader while the strict manufactures like moto and SE still suffered financial lost.
so when SE learn this with their new bootloader policy, moto still close their eyes and ignore their customers.
locked bootloader = no buy