Nokia 700 review: Agent seven double-oh
Samsung Galaxy Note N7000 review: Power play Motorola L2 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.6
- Features
-
7.1
- Performance
-
7.3
- dzuc
- Report
- 0
Great fon for those prefer without camera. The only comment I had is that memory space is not only small but very very small. With MP3 player build in, suggest memory to be at least 32MB. Good for at 5 to 6 songs.
- Reply
- 2006-01-01 15:53
- ibfe
- U
- Muhammad Sakhawat Hu
- Report
- 0
Worth waiting, at last a feature packed stylish quad band world phone will hit the market for those who do NOT prefer integrated camera feature. Cannot wait to buy this phone direct from Motorola.
Muhammad Sakhawat Hussain
- Reply
- 2005-12-29 00:29
- SkE9
- U
- eng chuan
- Report
- 0
Beautiful fon!!! The only drawback i should say is the memory - too small. Since MOTO had its wireless concept with BT, same must be carried out with the memory space - like 16MB minimum.
- Reply
- 2005-12-27 05:36
- b6tx
- U
- mor
- Report
- 0
looks like a nice phone for mid useres. lets hope that rhe price will be good. only motorola puts bluetooth in all thier new phone. very good!
- Reply
- 2005-12-25 15:40
- Mdqt
- U
- Kanga Knight
- Report
- 0
A cool, sexy, feature packed handset from the dudes at Moto. Can't wait to buy this phone and according to hearsay, Telstra (Australia) may introduce one model towards the end of 2005 and possibly will be available for pre-paid customers. (For Au)
Best Features:
Super slim candy bar at 11mm, (Slimmer than V3) colour display 128 x 160 pixels, bluetooth, push-to-talk, speakerphone, java 2.0, mms, usb, class 10 gprs, 5 mb onboard memory, 24 chord polyphonic ringtones including mp3 and great battery life (Approx. 310 hours s.b.)
Summary:
This is a entry level base model handset and blows away most opposition brands, comparing all features available.
Note:
This phone has not been released yet and all specifications, features and descriptions could be subject to change. Once I get my hands on this beauty, I will post a more in-depth review on this handset.
Stay Kool,
koolkid
- Reply
- 2005-10-29 10:42
- TKvc
- U
- sensible
- Report
- 0
Why is it that every feature-packed phone has to have a camera while the camera-free phones tend to be bulky, boring, and featureless? Finally, somebody took a step forward. Ultra-thin, bluetooth, video...all without a camera. For those of you complaining about the memory limit for MP3s, I don't think you need to be listening to music at 256kbps on a cell phone.
- Reply
- 2005-10-05 11:33
- 49c7
- U
- Adas
- Report
- 0
Hey! If you want an mp3 player buy an iPod, if you want a video player, buy a Palm if you want a camera buy one that has at least 4 mln pixels and optic focus, cameras in mobiles Buhaha what a joke only the new SE k750i shoots 'reasonable quality' photos, and this one SUPERB silverish, stylish and ultra thin!!!
- Reply
- 2005-08-19 19:18
- mbex
- U
- sam
- Report
- 0
If a black color is available for this model, I will buy one right away........
- Reply
- 2005-07-04 12:28
- SeFH
- U
- Ottoman
- Report
- 0
a perfect phone... :S
Video Player is available even if it does not have a camera :)
mp3 Player is available even if its memory is only 5 MB.. I think it can only have 1 mp3 :)
The worst thing is that it does not have Card slot :D
I wonder How Motorola Thought that they can sell it ??
Do not try to buy that, if you want to buy a phone without camera, just have a look at Siemens SP 65... it is very good :)
- Reply
- 2005-06-25 23:51
- mup8
- U
- Lod
- Report
- 0
Hah it has got TFT display with 265K colors, no camera but video player. Great! Mp3 player and 5 mb memory. No comment...
- Reply
- 2005-06-24 21:20
- nifi
- U
- sonic
- Report
- 0
This is the phone that I want. No camera but got bluetooth. In addition it is slim. Nice model.
- Reply
- 2005-04-18 14:44
- PFM9
- U
- Ped...
- Report
- 0
Mp3, Video and no card slot? Maybe it's wrong! hehehehe...
- Reply
- 2005-04-15 03:35
- P6Sd
- U
- sean
- Report
- 0
Good phone for low-end class. Should attract those who does not want gimmicks like VGA. Value for money if priced below USD150.
- Reply
- 2005-04-14 19:34
- U3WS
- U
- concerned consumer
- Report
- 0
hope this phone sells cheap. this is the only phone middle class can count on. i myself would want to have one of these phone for myself but it really depends on the pricing.
- Reply
- 2005-03-27 10:45
- TST8
- U
- AB
- Report
- 0
i wouldnt pay more than £100gbp for it. bad move moto indeed!
- Reply
- 2005-03-19 01:01
- mm{t
- U
- SomeOne
- Report
- 0
wow,, very stylish phone...
thin and so sexy...
i hope the price is less than 250 USD. This phone will rock on the low-end class....
But i hope motorola not just focus on design but also the features and performance...
Moto,, stay fashionable!!!
- Reply
- 2005-03-18 14:51
- UDNe
- U
