Nokia Lumia 800 review: New beginnings
Motorola RAZR XT910 review: Through thick and thinMotorola L2 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.6
- Features
-
7.1
- Performance
-
7.3
- poshandy
- Report
- 0
can anybody help me. I cant download any attachments sent with messages. it just says error unable to download. the manual doesnt appear to help.
- Reply
- 2007-12-28 10:38
- iIU6
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
I have had this phone for over half a year now. In my opinon it is a pretty good phone, althogh every once and a while it will lock up on me, ane the screen will go black for about 10 seconds, but i think that is due to the fact that it has been droped several times. Sometimes it is anoying trying to get it to conect to other phones via bluetooth but seeing as this is my first phone I dont have much experiance in that area. Overall I would give this phone good marks, i haven't had any problems with the sound, It would be better if it had a camara though. I use mine as a GoPhone and for that id say its more than enough.
(wow.. sorry.. but i find it funny when people post comments on the internet like they are texting their friends)
- Reply
- 2007-10-11 23:56
- Tga7
- U
- Luka
- Report
- 0
Can anyone tell me what is this option for:
Menu > Settings > Network > Network Setup > Speed?
Under speed there are four values: Slow, Medium, Fast, Continuous.
What is this option for? User guide downloaded from Motorolas web site says nothing. Thanks
- Reply
- 2007-09-27 16:28
- S7yN
- U
- PenPen
- Report
- 0
I've been using this phone for over a year, and love it. It has a long battery life, excellent reception (even in elevators and buildings), and is extremely light and thin. Plus, I got it for free.
- Reply
- 2007-09-14 00:51
- 4g}4
- U
- amit
- Report
- 0
i m using this phone from last 2 months but i m not satisfied. all the new buyers i m suggesting you not to get this phone as this is a wastage of money as well as time. the ear sound quality is so bad that a person cant be able to send his/her voice clearly.
& about ear phone i cn't tell you that how worst it is please i request you not to buy this worst among all worst gaget.
- Reply
- 2007-06-16 13:05
- ijeY
- U
- RJ
- Report
- 0
Have had this phone for 6 months now. The voice transmission quality is really bad and most people I call cannot hear me. Thought it was an intrument issue and got the piece replaced by this seems to be a general problem with the model. I have since heard that many users have a bad experience with this phone. Do not get this phone.
- Reply
- 2007-06-10 00:33
- x2uq
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
mr. gurvinder singh ......you got to reduce the image size to 128 x 98 to view the video on your l2 mobile phone.
- Reply
- 2007-05-10 21:08
- 2Z1G
- U
- gurvinder singh
- Report
- 0
i m using this phone for last 2 months
its a good phone but the only problem that i m facing wid dis phone is that i can not play
videos.............
- Reply
- 2007-05-10 05:45
- P$k6
- U
- Jake
- Report
- 0
Only reason i bought this phone is because i wanted the sony mp3 player phone but fido didnt have it at the time and i needed a phone so they said i can get this one and return it within 15 days when they had the sony one in stock. I never had time to return it so i got it for good now. I actually grew to like it but one feature i got pissed without was no camera. I find the voice quality is good compared to my moms razr. actually way better. she hates her razr after trying mine. The vibrate function i find depending on what im doing i can sometimes feel it and somtimes not. Another thing i do like is that you can compose your own songs on it. you can go to sites to learn to do this. i got the simpsons theme song on mine. but i do not like the selection of ringtones. i think the razr has a better one. Even my motorola v360 had better ones. and i miss the "Hello moto" ringtone.
- Reply
- 2007-05-09 08:11
- kDk7
- U
- srikanth from tamil
- Report
- 0
i am using this mobile for past 2 months. it can stores up to 8 MP3 songs of full lenght. you have to compress the song. very good screen. using bluetooth i can able to connect internet to computer.
- Reply
- 2007-05-08 22:31
- ijdi
- U
- welwyn
- Report
- 0
i hav been using dis fone since almost a year n now started having problems.. if i call some1 or receive a call n either party picks up the calls quickly say within 1-2 rings the other party gets a very annoying disturance.. first i thot it was my sim card n may be bcuz of network issued, but den i chgd sim n tried same issue.. figured out tht it was a speaker issue which caused it..
also i had a prob with regards to life of battery, after 30 mins its showed chrgd full but thn batt used to go dowm within 1hr even if i dont spk
- Reply
- 2007-04-29 17:24
- B$dt
- U
- sunny
- Report
- 0
i want to access gprs on computer with L2 can i do with L2 ?
- Reply
- 2007-04-26 19:36
- PWYH
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
oh plz tell me if u cam attach headphones on this phone?
- Reply
- 2007-04-26 07:08
- PSds
- U
- archer6
- Report
- 0
A great basic phone. Good build quality, great RF reception, call clarity and volume. Just what I was looking for in a phone to use on the weekends when I want to get away from the BlackBerry. 100% satisfied with L2.
- Reply
- 2007-04-04 21:21
- j@XB
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
I bought one off of ebay, the box says tri-band, but the phone menu offers all 4. Was I suckered?
- Reply
- 2007-03-27 17:31
- 45h@
- U
- ajay r bansal
- Report
- 0
if you interested in well priced phone without camera (due to workstation restriction) then just go for it. the drawbacks i could find are (1) doesn't have FM. (2) feels a bit large in hands though its quite slim. The good points are (1) supports mp3 ringtones which is quite desirable. (2) supports picture ID's of caller. (3) decent size screen 128x160 which is quite suffecient. (4) stores call duration of not only last call but last 20 calls.-v.v. nice thing; you don't find in other phones easily. (5) nice look of the keypads especially when they are illuminated. OVERALL-- A GOOD PURCHASE.
AJAY BANSAL, INDIA
- Reply
- 2007-03-09 22:01
- ij6r
- U
