Motorola L2 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.6
- Features
-
7.1
- Performance
-
7.3
- Aashish Jogani
- Report
This phone is already available at Cingular Wireless already. No, I am not confusing it with L6 and L7
- Reply
- 2006-04-14 00:40
- Q$5R
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
to the poater below the diffrence that the backlight time out just controls the time of the screen light and the display time out controls the display switching off
the second is for saving power
- Reply
- 2006-04-12 07:22
- jJqF
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Hello ! Somebody, please tell me what is the difference between this to options : display timeout and backlight. i can't see the use of timeout option because my phone's display turn off after few seconds, that i choose in backlight option...
- Reply
- 2006-04-04 16:40
- nwER
- U
- Help Help Help
- Report
How do I install Java games on this phone ?
I've got many games with *.jar and *.jad but what do I do with the files ?
- Reply
- 2006-03-22 14:53
- nmbh
- U
- Ahmad Faris
- Report
I agree with u guys talking about da memory.I'ts 2 small it is 10 MB.But da phone is still nice & good looking.Is it coming in Malaysia?...
- Reply
- 2006-03-19 10:41
- PTGJ
- U
- oladele ogunjobi
- Report
i like anything called motorola becos it has maning function.thanks
- Reply
- 2006-03-18 21:13
- NHYM
- U
- Smitty
- Report
Lots of mistakes in these specs. 1) 10MB of memory, not 5. 2) 500 phonebook memories, not 1000. 3) CSTN display 128x160. Not TFT. 4) Not designed as an MP3 player, just MP3 ringtones. Can be used for that, but limited by the 10MB. 5) Standard battery is 720mah, not 820. 6) No EDGE 7) Triband. Think of this as an L6 w/o the camera. Good, thin, stylish phone,w/o a camera (not everyone wants one!)
- Reply
- 2006-02-13 23:36
- ygq9
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
I dont really see the point of this phone, you minus well get the l7 or l6, atleast you have a memory slot and the same features
- Reply
- 2006-02-11 00:55
- 4TD3
- U
- Pete
- Report
I agree with u all
hope motorola didn't change the spec except the memory
can wait to have this phone too
- Reply
- 2006-02-07 13:24
- x{Vr
- U
- dzuc
- Report
Great fon for those prefer without camera. The only comment I had is that memory space is not only small but very very small. With MP3 player build in, suggest memory to be at least 32MB. Good for at 5 to 6 songs.
- Reply
- 2006-01-01 15:53
- ibfe
- U
- Muhammad Sakhawat Hu
- Report
Worth waiting, at last a feature packed stylish quad band world phone will hit the market for those who do NOT prefer integrated camera feature. Cannot wait to buy this phone direct from Motorola.
Muhammad Sakhawat Hussain
- Reply
- 2005-12-29 00:29
- SkE9
- U
- eng chuan
- Report
Beautiful fon!!! The only drawback i should say is the memory - too small. Since MOTO had its wireless concept with BT, same must be carried out with the memory space - like 16MB minimum.
- Reply
- 2005-12-27 05:36
- b6tx
- U
- mor
- Report
looks like a nice phone for mid useres. lets hope that rhe price will be good. only motorola puts bluetooth in all thier new phone. very good!
- Reply
- 2005-12-25 15:40
- Mdqt
- U
- Kanga Knight
- Report
A cool, sexy, feature packed handset from the dudes at Moto. Can't wait to buy this phone and according to hearsay, Telstra (Australia) may introduce one model towards the end of 2005 and possibly will be available for pre-paid customers. (For Au)
Best Features:
Super slim candy bar at 11mm, (Slimmer than V3) colour display 128 x 160 pixels, bluetooth, push-to-talk, speakerphone, java 2.0, mms, usb, class 10 gprs, 5 mb onboard memory, 24 chord polyphonic ringtones including mp3 and great battery life (Approx. 310 hours s.b.)
Summary:
This is a entry level base model handset and blows away most opposition brands, comparing all features available.
Note:
This phone has not been released yet and all specifications, features and descriptions could be subject to change. Once I get my hands on this beauty, I will post a more in-depth review on this handset.
Stay Kool,
koolkid
- Reply
- 2005-10-29 10:42
- TKvc
- U
- sensible
- Report
Why is it that every feature-packed phone has to have a camera while the camera-free phones tend to be bulky, boring, and featureless? Finally, somebody took a step forward. Ultra-thin, bluetooth, video...all without a camera. For those of you complaining about the memory limit for MP3s, I don't think you need to be listening to music at 256kbps on a cell phone.
- Reply
- 2005-10-05 11:33
- 49c7
- U
- Adas
- Report
Hey! If you want an mp3 player buy an iPod, if you want a video player, buy a Palm if you want a camera buy one that has at least 4 mln pixels and optic focus, cameras in mobiles Buhaha what a joke only the new SE k750i shoots 'reasonable quality' photos, and this one SUPERB silverish, stylish and ultra thin!!!
- Reply
- 2005-08-19 19:18
- mbex
- U
- sam
- Report
If a black color is available for this model, I will buy one right away........
- Reply
- 2005-07-04 12:28
- SeFH
- U
- Ottoman
- Report
a perfect phone... :S
Video Player is available even if it does not have a camera :)
mp3 Player is available even if its memory is only 5 MB.. I think it can only have 1 mp3 :)
The worst thing is that it does not have Card slot :D
I wonder How Motorola Thought that they can sell it ??
Do not try to buy that, if you want to buy a phone without camera, just have a look at Siemens SP 65... it is very good :)
- Reply
- 2005-06-25 23:51
- mup8
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed