i hope this will be available immediately in uae because last time the only moto that i saw in uae is g4 plus and moto z
the reason for this is battery being used in 3G areas without proper connectivity. You should shut down your phone whenever this happens, and then restart it.
naveen019, 17 Feb 201765% body to screen ratio???? Lenovo its time to recruit some good designers to moto section.....Even g3 had 67% haha
65% body to screen ratio????
Lenovo its time to recruit some good designers to moto section.....
Anonymous, 17 Feb 2017G4 come with SD 617, why G5 downgrade to SD430.
Just use SD 625 with 4,7" & kill moto Ese... moreBecause 430 may have lower clock speed but is based on 14 micron architecture (instead of 28)which saves around 35% power & avoids heating . Thats why 430 is preferred .
Same with SD 625 .
so, this is the new G4 play, I hope they sell it at the same price.
Does this phone still using virtual capacitive button like previous moto series
If not then I think it's not worth to wait
This thing looks particularly ugly. no upgrade to storage and ram over previous model. pathetic showing here.
G4 come with SD 617, why G5 downgrade to SD430.
Just use SD 625 with 4,7" & kill moto Eseries, leave it to lenovo A or C
Moto G6 4.7" screen? 4.7" perfect size. Big screen novelty is over.
Can we get some nice colors please, this ugly grey with black front is used by a hundred different models from China already. At least an all black device would be ok.
tallest guy, 22 Jan 2017i see in comments people want it in small screen size like 4.7 or 5 inch!???? what that...... ... moreI'm 6.5 feet and I still want a smaller screen. I often need the phone at work, therefore it has to fit a regular pocket. 5.5 inches hardly fit my pocket, 5 is perfect. I had the Huawei Mate S (great phone) and the phone started bending in my pocket when doing a squat - Huawei gave me my money back and I picked a smaller phone. :)
Motorola's' engineering is still mustering it away in 2002's technology and level of competition.
OK I take that back, 2008 not 2002, but never the less...