Motorola Motoluxe - user opinions and reviews

Motorola

Popularity

Daily interest
0.2%
Total hits:
865771

Voting results

Design
7.8
Features
7.3
Performance
7.2
Votes:
45

Sort by:

please come soon to iran or dubei

i love this phone

  • Reply
  • 2012-03-15 10:06
  • dQAP
  • R

Love the design, but I'll wait for Motoluxe Plus.. (if I haven't upgraded my phone)
http://www.linuxfordevices.com...and-MSM8225/
Easily upgrade to dualcore 1ghz by just changing the SoC.
Motorola had this planned like defy to defy plus.
I hope Plus version will have bigger battery tho..

  • Reply
  • 2012-03-15 03:31
  • tA$R
  • U

> In reply to shiban @ 2012-02-13 08:35 from rAZZ - click to readSamsung copying Motorola?? Tell me a phone which was copied by them. By the way I believe that Samsung is much more powerful than Motorola. Motorola is fantastic at one thing: battery. Samsung a year ago has taken the crown from Motorola, and had become number one in the USA as I remember right.

  • Reply
  • 2012-03-10 17:19
  • Laxe
  • R

For the same amount of money I can get far better deal than Motolux and that would be Xperia Arc S!

  • Reply
  • 2012-03-09 16:21
  • SwrL
  • U

why only 512MB ram? why dont moto use 1GB instead or 2GB maybe more than other phone does tis day?
where is android 4?

  • Reply
  • 2012-03-07 01:49
  • PMrM
  • C

This phone is 2012 phone, the standard should be raised to include at least 1GHz dual core processor in the mid tier phone. The Ram should also be raised to at least 2GHB for mid tier phone.Motorola should not just stick to the current trend and progress so slowly. It should take the lead to upgrade their hardware just like their 3300MAH battery in their Razr Maxx. If MOtorla can do this, it will becoem the leader of teh cell phone market, beating Samsung heads down. Otehrwise, if Samsung take teh lead to upgrade the standard in their software first, then Samsung will take the crown again.Be ware, Motorola.

  • Reply
  • 2012-03-06 18:11
  • q{Ze
  • C

> In reply to Murali @ 2012-02-01 04:41 from P$vt - click to readit would come to indian market somewhere in may and expected price is 19000 to 20000 rs

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-22 15:54
  • 2Zd{
  • R

> In reply to asn39 @ 2012-02-09 18:50 from vbT4 - click to readyes you are true about service centres and i too love motorola devices but rarely i found them they are only available only in metros and some selected cities motorola should come in indian market as am sick of boring nokia devices!

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-22 15:48
  • 2Zd{
  • R

Instead using 8 megapixel camera and 1400 mah battery,if it uses 5 mega pixel and 1800+ mah battery,then this phone will be the best on its price. range.

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-15 11:07
  • uvq}
  • U

> In reply to Mobilemaster @ 2012-01-10 12:33 from Lax6 - click to readSamsung is the company which took photocopy of motorola mobile

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-13 08:35
  • rAZZ
  • R

Yeah, qualcomm is selling their MSM7xxx dirt cheap.. And motorola try to sell it like a high class device, even named it luxe as deluxe.. The design worth mid range, but uses low end chips.

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-11 03:20
  • tA$S
  • U

This is a low end, single core device.
There will be a quad core tegra from Asus for 250$, that means lower then this thing here.

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-10 11:08
  • mjix
  • U

wohooo one more 800 mhz fighter currently on DEFY this shud price around defy's price only then only it is good :D love MOTOROLA Devices but HATE Moto service centers (india)

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-09 18:50
  • vbT4
  • U

Why motorola doesn't dare to compete with Arc S, Honor, Galaxy W. Qualcomm MSM8255T is the ideal phone for midrange. Single core, 1.4Ghz, Adreno 205. Get a bigger battery like Huawei Honor at 1900mAH, then this would be a great midrange phone. Shame on you motorola..

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-09 17:41
  • tA$M
  • U

phone could have "3ghz" or watever and they could not work properly. It only depends on the OS and parts. i have tested phones that has perfect proccesor but they work slow so ... depends in which case you are addressing

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-09 01:29
  • gCi@
  • C

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-02-03 12:14 from 5i4e - click to readI understand, but in its pictures the colors in it is like washed out, and also in the youtube videos made in CES 2012 the display is not shown very well. Here it just looks like my old phone, nokia 6233, which had 256k colors.

I already know that it has 16M colors from its official site (link: http://www.motorola.com/Consum...-XW-EN.alt), but the images are not very clear with respect to its display, and it made me think...

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-08 15:25
  • AdFj
  • R

First Defy with 800Mhz and than with same features Defy + .Only change was 1 Ghz.
Motorola guys are sleeping....

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-06 11:28
  • KgfR
  • U

> In reply to Eleo de Mobiles @ 2012-02-02 15:17 from J9xw - click to readMost likely it will have 16M. Motorola hasn't launched any 256k colored screen in a long while.

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-03 12:14
  • 5i4e
  • R

Does it have 256K or 16M colors?

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-02 15:17
  • J9xw
  • C

Hai,
May I know the realsing date and epertion price in india

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-01 04:41
  • P$vt
  • Q
Sort by:
Total of 250 user reviews and opinions for Motorola Motoluxe.