Motorola MPx

Motorola

Popularity

Daily interest
  N/A
Total hits:
701897

Voting results

Design
7.7
Features
7.8
Performance
7.5
Votes:
12

Also known as MPx300

Network Technology GSM
2G bands GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
GPRS Yes
EDGE No
Launch Announced 2004, 1Q
Status Discontinued
Body Dimensions 99.7 x 61.2 x 24 mm, 140 cc (3.93 x 2.41 x 0.94 in)
Weight 174 g (6.14 oz)
Keyboard QWERTY
SIM Mini-SIM
Display Type TFT resistive touchscreen, 65k colors
Size 240 x 320 pixels, 2.8 inches, 42 x 57 mm (~143 ppi pixel density)
 - Second color STN display (96 x 64 pixels)
- Dual hinges allow to open the device in both portrait and landscape mode
Platform OS Microsoft PocketPC 2003 SE
Chipset TI OMAP 1710
CPU 200 MHz ARM926EJ-S
Memory Card slot MMC/SD
Internal 32 MB
 - 16 MB free
Camera Primary 1.3 MP, 1280 x 960 pixels, LED flash
Video Yes
Secondary No
Sound Alert types Vibration; Polyphonic(24) ringtones
Loudspeaker No
3.5mm jack No
Comms WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11b
Bluetooth v1.1
GPS No
Infrared port Yes
Radio No
USB Yes
Features Messaging SMS, MMS, Email
Browser WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML
Java No
 - Pocket Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF viewer)
- MP3/AAC/AAC+/WMA/OGG/AMR player
- WMV/MP4 player
Battery   Li-Ion 960 mAh battery
Stand-by Up to 100 h
Talk time Up to 3 h
Misc Colors

Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more

Motorola MPx - user opinions and reviews

  • theCHOSENone

motorola or some other company should make more phones like these! A flip smartphone with stylus, using 1.5ghz krait cpu or something, would be phenomenal!

  • Reply
  • 2012-08-20 18:09
  • qb5x
  • U
  • asian people

Very Good Model, I hope Motorola can produce phone like this model again ( MPx ) , especially run with windows mobile. I'm and people really really loves this model, come on motorola.

  • Reply
  • 2010-12-01 13:40
  • uECq
  • U
  • alex

i wish that motorola may produce a windows mobile phone like this model again in the future, people really like this model. pleaseeee.....motorola....

  • Reply
  • 2010-01-25 11:27
  • uEBQ
  • Q