Motorola PEBL U3 - user opinions and reviews

Motorola

Voting results

Design
4.8
Features
4.2
Performance
4.4
Votes:
550
 Hits:
132427

the motorola pebl u3 or motorola phones they have no infraredpoat and os

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-16 06:23
  • PTpT
  • U

It's a low end phone.

Moto are gonna have a ROKR PEBL phone that will be mid range.

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-16 06:05
  • RNQ6
  • U

Is this a joke? Is it an entry level phone or is Motorola gonna use the design excuse to place a premium price tag on what is essentially a basic phone?

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-16 05:26
  • wfEe
  • U

Great design - better than the Sony Ericsson Z320 and Z250 - and I like Sony Ericsson phones normally.

But... it still uses the old and horrible menu system which is far inferior to the Sony Ericsson ones.

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-16 05:11
  • RNQ6
  • U

if motorola intends to sell it as entry level=cheap line it is great.if not it is horrible.

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-16 03:12
  • M}L}
  • U

NICE ENTRY motorola
U3 wish u a good luck.... may you prove + for motorola

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-16 02:20
  • PSdH
  • U

No:1

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-16 02:19
  • w0Qx
  • U

NICE fone
1)DESIGN IS OFFCourse COOL like U6
2) Features sre ok but Memory card and radio was supposed to be in it.
3) Price b/w 90-110 $ (USD) will be a favour in the sales of this fone. Like motofone f3 (Which is a very big hit)


Well motorola................. i'll rate ur fone by QUALITY AND PRICE RATIO

8/10 (90 $)
7/10 (100$)
6/10 (110+ $)

wEL the fone has a fabulous design

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-16 02:06
  • PSdH
  • U

This is a downgraded version of the U6.

Like the LG KG800 down to the KG280.

Hopefully the U9 will be an upgrade.

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-16 01:48
  • Yaiu
  • U

Where's the mega pixels camera ??? and about the card slot ... tesk tesk.. disappointed too

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-16 01:47
  • LjPx
  • U

r u joking... there is no upgrade from the u6, and even that wasn't very good... im disappointed with you motorola, I gotta say.

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-16 00:02
  • kxxB
  • U

This release must be a practical joke of some kind?!?!?!?
A 'new' version/re-release of a two year old phone were almost all specs are the same or WORSE???
The FORM is good though, the very round shape make it much more robust...

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-15 23:11
  • iAfC
  • U

This cellphone seemed to be useless...

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-15 22:43
  • m8mM
  • U

This is the worst announcement ever. Waiting for something better from Motorola.

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-15 22:42
  • mV7d
  • U

Hey people wait a minute... this phone is already released here in brazil about one and half a year.only coming out now, that's it. it's like the lg kg 280.... same problem

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-15 22:32
  • P2dq
  • U

cooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
rateeeeeeeeeeeee itttttttttttttt very nicelyyyyyyyyyyyyyy plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-15 21:32
  • PSdH
  • U

I like Moto, but WTF???

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-15 21:09
  • nsL1
  • U

come on Motorola... a new phone announced near end of 2007 and a VGA camera. Would rather suggest skipping the camera in such a case....There are so many people who need phones with good music/video playback functions, radio, and data/internet solutions like EDGE or 3G but are not allowed to carry camera phones at work... this would fill a big need in the market..

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-15 20:55
  • 2Z13
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.