HTC One V review: Chin up
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III review: S to the thirdMotorola Q8 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.6
- Features
-
7.4
- Performance
-
7.4
- James
- Report
- 0
Have not had good experience with motorola's, so in reality...its still just a motorola. And its kinda ugly.
- Reply
- 2006-07-19 02:25
- PTcY
- U
- notorious
- Report
- 0
Show more pictures and d camera shud hav a higher mega pixel
- Reply
- 2006-07-16 07:05
- THDZ
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
The real grade of the "Q"
Design : 9.5
Features : 8.5
Performance : 8.5
*Overall, it's under-rated by
our voting poll.
- Reply
- 2006-07-15 20:22
- Y9ph
- U
- DAVID
- Report
- 0
come on people wake up i think the real probelm with people not understanding the q is they understanding of basic and formal comprehesion to read and follow simple guide lines thats why its not common sense as people would say, all the time its called applied thinking if it was that common every single one on the planet would have it...
- Reply
- 2006-07-15 02:42
- karq
- U
- tony
- Report
- 0
i am the proud owner of a q i had some of moto phone before that gave trouble the q is an excellent device besides being ultra thin and full of hardware and unlimted software its a device i will advice any one to get and stop hitting out at the device the phone is just superb.when gsm users get a chance they will realize the true power of this fantastic device .
- Reply
- 2006-07-15 02:35
- karq
- U
- nickhead
- Report
- 0
The Q is awesome. It is very thin and lightweight with a hellova lot of functionality. I dont understand the bashing of this device. It is certainly not a laptop..users that gripe about the Q need to buy a laptop and keep their pie-holes shut. Here is the true skinny without the bias:
PROs: thin, lightweight, easy navigation, lot of functionality, VERIZONs high speed EvDO network and web browsing on this phone is super!, nice keyboard.
CONs: No editing software to write notes etc. (must purchase), the thin form factor is not very comfortable to talk on (kind of holding a peice of bathroom tile to your ear).
In conclusion this is not a replacement for a laptop or other computer but an enhancement to those devices. More versitle than most PDAs and lighter in weight. No Wi-Fi but if you get the unlimited plan for data, wi-fi doesnt matter much unless you constantly cannot get signal (then again why have a cell phone?).
Now go forth and chuck your clunky cell phone for a Q. And if you cannot handle the Q, buy a queer blackberry...
Deez
- Reply
- 2006-07-11 21:58
- FqEE
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Love the Q.
pros: Easy "one-hand" navigation.
Great looking device.
Works on Windows 5.0
Great camera.
Many add-ons we can add.
High Speed internet.
Can Read 2GB memory card.
Cons: No wifi(I don't need it).
Battery life is average.
Can freeze but much less than the TREO.
Hard to operate at first.
OVERALL: GOT TO LOVE THE "Q"
- Reply
- 2006-07-09 19:13
- Y7L7
- U
- LukeR
- Report
- 0
What a piece of junk. It is barely worthy of a name like Smartphone.
Navigation is clumsy and the display never shows you which way to go for a different function.
You may never find out where you are in the phone menu or how to back out to use a different function without wiping out what you're currently doing.
Its such a bad feeling you dont want to continue with it.
CDMA-Verizon has an exclusive on this but I know 1 woman who returned it in 1 day in favor of a Treo/Windows Mobile5.1.
The Windows 5.1 is awesome and is overall, much easier to run in a corporate IT environ. if running Windows et all.
(Blackberry/RIM-stuff is nice but yknow what, no thanks...New patches daily....weeeee what fun...what a headache-and Blackberry Ent - works great but its all based on covreage).
Q is poo
- Reply
- 2006-07-06 05:20
- xXTJ
- U
- matt
- Report
- 0
Can you download true ringtones(short clips of the actual song) like I could on my E813? If so, how do I download new ringtone for this phone? The stock ringtones are awful.
- Reply
- 2006-07-05 20:15
- F$@0
- U
- Xshan
- Report
- 0
Can any one tell me this mob is GSM or wat i think the MOB is not bad it look's great i have herd that it came out for CDMA is it ture?
- Reply
- 2006-07-04 17:19
- P5pM
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
this sux it doesnt have wifi wat kind of smartfone doesnt have wifi get the e61 much better choice and aslso better screen
- Reply
- 2006-07-03 20:41
- jBHL
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
for all of u hu think nokia suks compare it to there smartfone its thin and has better features like battery nd also if u said that nokias colors screens was the worst how can u compare the q is a 65k scrren nd has no mp3 player and the nokia screen is a 16 million not 65 thousand like the q its a billion times more collars and has an mp3 player. bout the reception i was wit my frends 1 hu has a razr and one withe a samsung the razr had noservice the samsung had one bbar and my nokia had full reception
- Reply
- 2006-07-03 20:35
- jBHL
- U
- JB
- Report
- 0
This phone would be better with wifi but what sucks is the fact you cant buy the minisd wifi card to go with it because the idiots at motorola didnt put enough power to it. otherwise its a great phone minus the fact that the smartphone windows 5.0 has essentially outlook and thats it...
- Reply
- 2006-06-29 08:15
- YfhC
- U
- EC
- Report
- 0
Has any bought the new silicon skin for the Q yet? I ordered mine on boxwave like 2 weeks ago and is still on preordered. I'm trying to cancel it now... Does anyone know if the skin fits Q that has extended battery?
- Reply
- 2006-06-27 00:30
- 5Ere
- U
