Motorola Q 11 - user opinions and reviews

Motorola

Popularity

Daily interest
0.1%
Total hits:
477723

Voting results

Design
7.9
Features
7.9
Performance
7.9
Votes:
1727


Sort by:

Woooow and here I was looking at ZN5... All the goodness of Q9 with worthy updates. As soon as I hear $500 or lower AND extended battery, I'm sold through and through.

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-12 00:45
  • 4qMA
  • U

realy it is not good

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-11 20:11
  • nXEx
  • C

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...ture=related Watch this video and stop at 1:14 and 0:04.What are these phones?

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-11 17:26
  • 0V7M
  • U

Motorola sucks but atleast this Q has wi-fi

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-11 16:13
  • 0dFs
  • U

With the 64MB RAM make the like window Mobile 6.1 going back to Window 2003 SE. 128MB RAM, please. Why not Comparing HTC Diamond? It's got them all!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-11 15:02
  • PA$w
  • C

Something's wrong with the display ? is it calibration or what ??

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-10 22:00
  • Tmd9
  • U

Motorola hit the bottom :-(






the final nail in the coffin

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-10 21:15
  • mMGw
  • C

After one hard year of sweating and long, sleepless nights, they have finally accomplished their far-fetched goal...they have managed to REMOVE the 3.5G from the Q9h!

Isn't this amazing???

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-10 20:42
  • nmCi
  • U

> In reply to a @ 2008-10-10 19:10 from nDAm - click to readARM7 LTE is communication processor.
Processor responsible for OS is INTEL BULVERDE.
LOOK http://www.motorola.com/motoin...ObjectId=267

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-10 19:21
  • 0nnH
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-10-10 15:42 from pTe6 - click to readOld technology in new package .

ARM7 Processor ???? , and 64 Megs of RAM ????

Much worse than anticipated.

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-10 19:10
  • nDAm
  • U

Something is weak, but not bad at all.

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-10 18:06
  • mg%Q
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-10-10 15:15 from M3s@ - click to readthats like asking if its got a colour screen.

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-10 17:46
  • mCSY
  • R

This phone can not even be compared to P1! Then some ppl compare this sh.. to sth like HTC touch diomand, touch pro or X1???? No 3G, no touch screen, no motion sensor, poor video recording, only 64 MB of ram, poor battery life, small screen and not even a single radio!!! C'mon Motorola, radio was invented more than 100 years ago!!! Motorola must put cellphones away!!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-10 16:12
  • mCiT
  • U

No 3G????? Motorola must be ashamed.

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-10 15:42
  • pTe6
  • U

does this have the same function as a blackberry i.e push email

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-10 15:15
  • M3s@
  • Q


Motorola VC6096

- 6.5" TFT Touchscreen 65k colour 640x480 pixel
- Windows Mobile 6.1 Professional
- Intel XScale PXA270 624MHz CPU
- 128MB RAM, 256MB ROM
- QWERTY Keyboard
- HSDPA
- WiFi
- SiRF Star III GPS Receiver


  • Reply
  • 2008-10-10 14:46
  • M@Ti
  • U

> In reply to Ravi...! @ 2008-10-10 07:48 from 2TH8 - click to readexcellent phone!!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-10 09:44
  • pctY
  • R

need touch screen lke iphone...! this technology is too old,, motorola plz inovate something new....!

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-10 07:48
  • 2TH8
  • U

How come the stand by time is so little??

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-10 07:26
  • q}H%
  • Q

what a pity smartphone... no 3G, not class 32 GPRS, and small display.

  • Reply
  • 2008-10-10 02:59
  • whBa
  • U

Sort by:
Total of 185 user reviews and opinions for Motorola Q 11.