Motorola Q 9h - user opinions and reviews

Motorola

Popularity

Daily interest
1.6%
Total hits:
835905

Voting results

Design
8.0
Features
8.0
Performance
8.0
Votes:
2739

=============================================
To: Josh

Yes I noticed it, the guy about he calculator thing, should have some new original stuff, and the one that said cheap design, I can take it for this model but when it comes to design and high quality materials motorola ROCKs, is the king sorry for you if you are blind
=============================================
Yup, "nawir" doesn't has brain to thinking before posting. To many silly posting and many blind people; blind everything about "Motorola".

Let's we look the design and high quality materials between "Motorola Q Series" with "Nokia E61". "Motorola Q Series" has "high sense of design" and "high quality materials" (aluminium / titanium, i am not sure but of course not low plastic quality). "Nokia E61" has "strange design" and "low quality materials" (cheap plastic). Hahaha...

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-29 12:21
  • PDLx
  • U

Yes I noticed it, the guy about he calculator thing, should have some new original stuff, and the one that said cheap design, I can take it for this model but when it comes to design and high quality materials motorola ROCKs, is the king sorry for you if you are blind

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-29 02:50
  • N952
  • U

===============================================
nawir

hey dude
is it a phone or calcultor
===============================================
If said that. Is same you said to Nokia E61, Sony Ericsson M600, O2, Samsung i320, and many PDA Phone.

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-15 20:36
  • PDLx
  • U

hey dude
is it a phone or calcultor

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-14 03:11
  • wrg}
  • U

to VEGITA:

processor specs: ARM1136 OMAP2420

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-12 05:26
  • PPCh
  • U

i think it uses
520MHz XScale processor

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-10 09:25
  • PSdH
  • U

Does anyone knows anything about the processor type and clock speed? thc

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-08 19:34
  • nH7g
  • U

i believe this is a truly wonderful device however its missing one thing.....WiFi. Until then its just another PDA from Motorola....

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-08 01:14
  • jy9J
  • U

You couldn't possibly have one of these phones as they are not even finished testing! Its sad people think they have to lie about the phones they own.

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-07 17:25
  • mJ2Z
  • U

this PDA is aiight but no WLAN. shame.... Ram is more than 64mb wow!!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-07 10:54
  • M$2a
  • U

its simply awesome, I loved it,

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-06 12:06
  • PSLa
  • U

WHAT FLOOR PLEASE?, this phone is off the shizzle mizzle cacazilm i have 3 of them, im a better actor than the other guy, hes jokes going nowhere, slash PEACE

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-06 00:34
  • jEea
  • U

cheap design

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-03 21:59
  • F4pr
  • U

looking forward to test the 1st Q but not available in asia at all... sigh...

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-02 03:09
  • FYRL
  • U

Being the actor that I am, I have had the chance to own some of the coolest phones. The phones pictured in my movies are usually my real phones. Recently I put out a movie on Disney Channel called High School Musical; I play the main character 'Troy'. Due to the overwhelming response of that movie, my producers have offered to give me some of the coolest phones on the market, I chose the Moto Q Q9. It' is a cool phone and allows me to keep up with a lot and stay organized! -Kool Fone-

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-26 20:04
  • QtQP
  • U

It's rated low because we are sick and tired of Moto vaporware product announcements two years before they actually get around to releasing the actual phone. The Q was origionally announced Jul 25 2005, you can count for yourself, here in Asia if the Q9 is released in the second quarter of 2007 that will be two years for a Q. HeloMoto? Hello Vaporware.

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-19 07:05
  • PFMh
  • U

no wlan,screen size n colors,only drawbacks,other features good. shud be better rated

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-17 04:36
  • ijf}
  • U

loved it!!!!!!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-16 14:10
  • P0GS
  • U

@kal

Lol, BlackJack, the worst windows phone, i think i would prefer HTC excalibur.

This one is better than the original Q, but to be frank, i think original Q in black is better than this, but i somehow like this keypad

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-16 10:10
  • F4pr
  • U

I loved the Q in black, they really did improve on it, in literally everyway. The one downside to this and the blackjack, is the screen size, its a tad to small but its still useable im 90% sure im getting this, jsut gotta play around with it first.

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-16 04:40
  • Y9kS
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.