Motorola Q 9h - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.0
- Features
-
8.0
- Performance
-
8.0
- Anonymous
- Report
Shame that it doesn't have wlan. It seem moto haven't really manage to include that into their thin platform yet.
- Reply
- 2007-02-16 04:06
- ygrv
- U
- Richard Buchanan
- Report
the original Q in black looks more like the blackjack than this. not sure how that's relevant.
if you could see the q9 in a different color you wouldn't notice any similarities.
- Reply
- 2007-02-16 03:10
- kx4%
- U
- Kal
- Report
I liked the original Q design. It was somewhat unique... with the round navigation key and all, sorry to say but its now looking more like Blackjack.
- Reply
- 2007-02-15 09:49
- 2SU$
- U
- Richard Buchanan
- Report
phonescoop.com's editor did an analysis of the motorola q9.
he found that it was an improvement in every way over the original.
"The original Q had an odd size ratio that was unusually long, and it's size/weight ratio made it feel slightly cheap. The new Q9 suffers from neither issue, with a size, shape, and weight that feels perfectly balanced and solid.
The keyboard is the biggest single improvement. The new keys are simply fantastic. One nice thing about the original Q was how the extended bottom section gave you plenty to hold on to while typing with your thumbs. When you first see the Q9, you might think the buttons are too close to the bottom to type while keeping the phone comfortably balanced, but in fact the way the bottom edge is beveled out makes it surprisingly easy to hold and type."
more in article here at phonescoop.com:
http://www.phonescoop.com/arti...ndex.php?p=q
i realize it is not as attractive as the original was when it premiered but motorola had to balance functionality with design if they wanted to be taken seriously in the smartphone field. they've done a fine job as it looks to have the most comfortable keyboard of the smartphones and a more hefty, durable plastic instead of the cheaper feel of the original Q.
- Reply
- 2007-02-15 04:58
- CfhA
- U
- Samsung Slave
- Report
i loved this phone, i hope it wont be too expensive becuz i plan to buy this one.
- Reply
- 2007-02-15 01:10
- PjBR
- U
- Alex
- Report
Windows Mobile 6 is an improvement.
http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/...e/#more-4248
- Reply
- 2007-02-14 12:17
- 2G64
- U
- Nate
- Report
ppff, absoloute crap, windows mobile is slow. yes its HSDPA but the software is slow. crap phone, i prefer the E61i from Nokia.
Thats all.
- Reply
- 2007-02-14 08:42
- PWHi
- U
- san francisco
- Report
WTF?! Moto should have stayed with the old Q design, this design is Ugly! I loved the old design but because the features sucked and it has windows! bleh How stupid of a decision to go with windows from Moto!!! Symbian is the worlds leading Operating System for smart phones, it covers 75% on all smart phones. What makes Moto think that they can go with Windows and still be successful? Stupid! No wi-fi, no fm, no gps! Hello! Last time i looked it was 2007, not 1997! Goddddd.. how stupid! Who is running moto nowadays anyway? He/she should be fired!
- Reply
- 2007-02-14 04:37
- 4$qx
- U
- Jay84Virgo "Jeremy"
- Report
"Hell" to the "Yes". This is my next phone. I was gonna hold out for the blackberry 8800 crimson coming in april with full QWERTY keypad, wifi, and camera, but I've got a change of heart. This has a US "T-Mobile compatible" HSDPA radio capable running on T-Mobile's New 1700 3g bands. Who needs WIFI when you've got 3g coverage? As I said b4, "Hell" to the "Yes".
- Reply
- 2007-02-13 17:20
- 415S
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed