Apple iPhone 4S review: Fast 4ward
Motorola RAZR XT910 review: Through thick and thinMotorola RIZR Z3 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.1
- Features
-
7.7
- Performance
-
7.7
- bob
- Report
- 0
phone looks great, has 2mp camera which is all that's needed, shame that they have not gone for a decent screen resolution of 320x240 as it is a decent size at 1.9 inches, this only thing that puts me off, and the fact that it doesn't seem to have support for mp4 video playback.
- Reply
- 2006-09-08 12:50
- nU1d
- U
- jezusrvd
- Report
- 0
uhh guess again its about 1,400 for the moment.i hope it will go down soon but till then ama stik to my nokia K800i
- Reply
- 2006-09-08 07:34
- jf%b
- U
- Stephanie
- Report
- 0
hey guyz welllll i like this phone i think its reaLLY aweseome and im getting it, how much is it going to be $500?!?! lol well some one tell me!!
have a good chat =p
- Reply
- 2006-09-07 00:17
- jZwx
- U
- ghost
- Report
- 0
looks good and i bet it's good too.but God forrbid it will brake the service for motorola is lamer than lame.i know i sell phones.if a motorola brakes(it doesn't happen a lot thou)it's a very complicated procedure wich sends the phone in another city and in the meantime you will stay without a phone.and realy they don't care.pls the menu is weak.
- Reply
- 2006-09-06 12:29
- mYdd
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
It's a nice "silm is in?" style phone. although the price of this phone is going to be very high. i think they should have brought the Motorola Z MS 600. http://kr.product.shopping.yah...833#zoomreal . if motorola had put this phone out in the Canadian market through Rogers or Fido i think it would have done well, but i don't work for motorola ~ so why do i care? i just want a new phone !
- Reply
- 2006-09-04 01:39
- kxNI
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
I have used Samsung, Nokia, S-E, and Alcatel. Motorola is the one to have -build quality is the best and my Motorolas never ever crashed. Nokias creak when you first buy them, and the keys are plasticky,if you want quality Motorola is the way. The only fault was the user interface and these new products have addressed that issue.
- Reply
- 2006-08-31 21:05
- mJe{
- U
- Kal
- Report
- 0
Why on the God's green earth you guys are comparing this with D900? No other brands come close to miniaturising a phone other than Samsung NOW.Yeh, they use plastic..but hey they dont look so cheap like Nokias at all..it feels good and solid..Read the reviews or buy one..you will know...they are all matt finish...unlike moto who is showing off with glossy finsih to attact people..but in reality which will be a fingerprint magnet.
You guys have to wait for another year to see this in the market..then it will take another year for moto to sort out their software problem...by then every nanny-grany will have one...but well if still you wanna buy one and show off,.. if you are so desparate to spend more that 1G...then go ahead and clik on cti-miami.com. All the best to you crazy folks.
- Reply
- 2006-08-31 11:12
- Ybt$
- U
- namezis
- Report
- 0
not to bad phones.nice looking, i might consider this one, 2mp with flash or light??
- Reply
- 2006-08-31 07:53
- PP$8
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
"Never buy a motorola, bad warranty, bad customer service, waste of money & worse of all if something goes wrong with your phone they dont even care" - truests words ever.
- Reply
- 2006-08-30 21:47
- Nxsf
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Hey! This phone is unliited no. of times better than the samsung d900
- Reply
- 2006-08-30 09:10
- 2WbP
- U
- SocialSmoker
- Report
- 0
Never buy a motorola, bad warranty, bad customer service, waste of money & worse of all if something goes wrong with your phone they dont even care
- Reply
- 2006-08-30 07:45
- TIBp
- U
- khidir
- Report
- 0
i'm planning to get one of this phone.i need to know this phone is a troublesm or not..
- Reply
- 2006-08-30 05:40
- TSTX
- U
- Mike
- Report
- 0
Stop bitching about the weight of this phone!
As the previous guy has mentioned this phone is made of strong mental ( Mature Male looking phone)
You will really look cheap and stupid
when you use a phone that has low earpiece volume!
- Reply
- 2006-08-29 06:27
- 4sbn
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Samsung is light because Samsung's phone r using plastic, but MOTO's r using metal for the construction.See SLVR n X820 then u'll know the diff.
- Reply
- 2006-08-28 10:54
- PSPa
- U
- Cyprus
- Report
- 0
We are the BIGGEST wholesaler of Motorola products in Cyprus and one think that I can assure you is that Samsung are NO CHEAP products.
We are VERY OBJECTIVE and neutral. I am neither in favour of Samsung nor Motorola. Or in favour of any other brand. We are trying to be fair.
If you compare Samsung Z510 vs Motorola V3i again the Samsung is well ahead as it is a 3G, better menu, better construction.
The D900 which is REAL stock and it is only 85gr with 3.2MPixel, it belongs to a different league!! The RIZR will be less equiped and the only thing that reamins is to evaluate its quality construction. But, at 115gr it will be 50% bigger than 85gr Samsung.
- Reply
- 2006-08-28 10:42
- mCX6
- U
