Motorola ROKR E1 - user opinions and reviews
Voting results
- Design
-
7.9
- Features
-
8.0
- Performance
-
7.9
- Votes:
- 4357
- Hits:
- 726912
- Anonymous
- Report
to fonefanatik it wasn't motorola the imposed the 100 son limit it was apple as to stop people going 4 this over am ipod and i work 4 o2 and we had a demo of the fone it works great and the fact that it has a 2.5mm jack makes it better that the w800 cause u need the fast port interface to use standard head phones not a 2.5mm jack adapter and yes i have had a play with the w800 as sony were in a few days b4 showing it and i can't w8 2 get this phone
- Reply
- 2005-10-05 11:49
- MF{P
- U
- qing
- Report
the fone has a rhythm lights.. but may i know will it light up if theres a incoming call??
thankz
- Reply
- 2005-10-04 12:52
- PFMY
- U
- singaporeguy
- Report
in my country singapore, u only need to pay S$60 more than this hp to get a K750i with a standard 2yr mobile plan. so this hp is not really value-for-money for the price it command.
- Reply
- 2005-10-03 16:36
- PFMY
- U
- Fonefanatik
- Report
This looks to be a bit of a dissapointment,it's merely an E398 with I-tunes software.I have an E398,don't get me wrong it's music capabilities are excellent and blow the pants off my much more expensive samsung D500,but the ROKR could easily have been a much better phone,if moto had chucked in a megapixel cam,tweaked the design,maybe threw in an FM radio and not imposed the 100 limit for i-tunes they could have had a winner,sadly though I don't really see this faring too well.
- Reply
- 2005-10-03 15:53
- myCp
- U
- alex
- Report
yes but on contract its the exact same price... so why have the inferior phone when you'll pay the same amouont a month... and i garentee there is more chance of it going wrong than the w800i...
- Reply
- 2005-10-03 10:32
- F9qx
- U
- theNext
- Report
If think it's an excellent phone for this money and i don't know why many people compare it with much expensive phone. Of course W800 is better, but it's also more expensive!
- Reply
- 2005-10-02 21:05
- mAWE
- U
- alex
- Report
ive just finished playing with this phone and im very very very disapointed.... please people before you rush out to buy this, look at the sony ericsson w800i!!! for the love of god... the sonys super phone is 25 million times better than this!!!!! its so slow an is itunes really that big a deal??? when the w800i software can rip music straight from the cd???? and a vga cam or the 2 mega pixel???? i know which one i would go for... the other thing is try and get the sim card, battery and memory card out of the motorola and back in again easily... its so frustrating i thought i was gonna break ever componant of it!!!!!! this phone is dire....
- Reply
- 2005-10-02 15:21
- F9qx
- U
- nothing
- Report
cmon.. i juz brought this fone.. it's hang on the first day.. it kill my first impression of motorola..
- Reply
- 2005-10-01 12:47
- PUM9
- U
- happyseller
- Report
just found out the price of this phone in oz. it's $459 and that's about $300 bucks cheaper than the K750i. might get one in.
- Reply
- 2005-10-01 01:57
- Fv0q
- U
- Ezrin
- Report
I have tried this phone and it is rubbish. Sorry, but if you want a Motorola with an MP3 player, I would suggest you wait for the SLVR L7. It is a much better phone. It has all the design and function of a V3 plus MP3 player and FM Radio!! I will deffinitely wait for that.
- Reply
- 2005-09-30 12:11
- ms6u
- U
- Sanju
- Report
It's a very Smart, Trendyphone. Listining to music thru head is a wounderful experience, it feels like ur sinting in A Class Concert hall. I have used a lots of hand devices , when u play music on full picth they creat head ache. But's in this device u love to play musin for long hours on full pitch.
KEEP IT UP MOTOROLA and expect more good quality device in future.
- Reply
- 2005-09-30 07:50
- iwqX
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
this phone is so disappointed, same old design as E398 , no megapixel camera , and the Itune funcion is not really convenient for such a mobile phone
- Reply
- 2005-09-29 18:34
- Mqmt
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
I want ask to anyone who complain about the memory. Are you listening the musics until the memory empty / listening for 400 songs? I don't think so. If you just want a big memory, you can buy "mp3 player" or "iPOD".
If you complain about the camera. What for? I think, you must be buy "digital camera". If you buy "Sony Ericsson W800" just for mp3, you can get 1 or 2 unit iPOD for 40 GB.
- Reply
- 2005-09-28 17:53
- PFgN
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
I want ask to anyone who complain about the memory. Are you listening the musics until the memory empty / listening for 400 songs? I don't think so. If you just want a big memory, you can buy "mp3 player" or "iPOD".
If you complain about the camera. What for? I think, you must be buy "digital camera". If you buy "Sony Ericsson W800" just for mp3, you can get 1 or 2 unit iPOD for 40 GB.
- Reply
- 2005-09-28 17:53
- PFgN
- U
- sat
- Report
the motorola company is introducing very best phones. and this rokr is da example for their target.this may be the best phone other than nokia.the sounds and picture quality of this phone is very good.
- Reply
- 2005-09-28 11:02
- Uiw@
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
If Apple was so concerned about having a rival to their product, why the hell would they produce the ROKR E1. This limitation will just put off people from actually buying this phone.
I'd rather buy one of the Sony Ericsson ones or maybe that new one from Nokia or maybe we should just get the E398. That'll save some money.
- Reply
- 2005-09-28 09:15
- RNQa
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
The reason Motorola have capped the songs at 100 is because Apple were worried about the E1 becoming an actual challenger to the iPod Crown. As if Apple would agree to a phone capable of carrying a 2GB memory card, that could challenge the new iPod Nano.
- Reply
- 2005-09-27 18:43
- S35r
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed