Motorola Timeport P7389 - user opinions and reviews
- Amanda
- Report
I like it a lot. It's both convenient and functional. I recommend it.
- Reply
- 2002-02-01 16:39
- U
- Bogdan Giurgiu
- Report
STOP AND READ!!!
This is the worst phone i had in my life for this price! It's menus are weaker then the Alcatel OTE DB, even the 'old' 5110 is much better in menus! It has the same annoyng menus as a Motorola 3688 that I hat two years ago.
If you had other phones, as Siemens M35i, Nokia 3310, Ericsson T10, or some like, I swear to God, it's not worth it! Although it was new, I kept that phone for two weeks, and i traded it for a Nokia 3310+15$ (cool, huh?). Apart from the good batterry time (150h/2h) - real times, and the astonishing signal, it has nothing good in it! It is a shame for a trademark like Motorola! This phone shoud have been released on the market 3-4 years ago, not now. Or at least at this price.
Best regards.
- Reply
- 2001-12-15 04:09
- U
- Tudor Suciu
- Report
Well in the mean time I discovered what was the problem: at the first charge motorola needed 10+ min to be charged before it was able to get on the network... but after that, good phone!
- Reply
- 2001-10-06 23:39
- U
- bortoi
- Report
It's a very good phone, but I fell some head pain when I use it more time. I have read about it that it has high SAR rate.
- Reply
- 2001-10-06 10:43
- U
- elizabeth Chubbuck
- Report
I like the phone except for it needs a keypad cover, as one bump and its dialing someone I didnt want to dial. And lock feature is a pain to unlock cuz by the time you do, its flipped to voicemail. Also it never shows you who's call you missed, just that you missed one, so you cant call back My old Nokia did that, and it is the most valuable yet simple feature
- Reply
- 2001-09-17 12:36
- U
- Tudor Suciu
- Report
Well, maybe it's just bad luck, but I bought one and 10 minutes after using it when I tried to set up the WAP it just blocked itself forever...
Otherwise it's a good phone.
- Reply
- 2001-09-05 01:43
- U
- Jerry Owusu Ansah
- Report
this is just to let you know that i appreciate every bit of this handset.
- Reply
- 2001-08-13 19:08
- U
- Miklos Nemeth
- Report
I bought the P7389 because I needed a
WAP-, infrared- and wireless data modem-capable, tri-band (900/1800/1900) GSM phone for a reasonable price. I'm using the phone in the USA with a VoiceStream SIM card and EarthLink ISP services. I'm not totally happy with the WAP-browser (Phone.Com's UP.Browser 4.1) but on the whole for this price
for the services I needed P7389 is the best choice at the moment. It works as advertised.
Possibly the Ericsson R520m, T39, T68 will be better when available
but at a much more higher price.
- Reply
- 2001-04-26 07:03
- U
- hygy
- Report
I've got a P7389 but the alarm function isn't working and I cant use 3 colors. Any one idea? The other things is true. And is it posseble that I see who send me an sms i mean not only the number, if that number is in my phonebook then write out the name not the number.
- Reply
- 2001-01-02 09:45
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed