Nokia Lumia 800 review: New beginnings
BlackBerry Bold 9900 review: Business reimaginedMotorola V980 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.2
- Features
-
7.1
- Performance
-
7.1
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
No Bluetooth ?!?!?!!?!?!?? I can't believe!!! COME ON MOTOROLA
- Reply
- 2004-12-27 01:51
- U
- KindOfItsOwn
- Report
- 0
No Bluetooth and no infrared.
Just some bullshit to be one of the first on market with UMTS.
- Reply
- 2004-12-19 23:57
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
for £150 its alot better than the lg u8120 which is the same price.
- Reply
- 2004-12-16 23:07
- U
- zeg
- Report
- 0
with bluetooth is was almost perfect...(and a megapixel camera too...)
- Reply
- 2004-12-06 16:41
- U
- samantha
- Report
- 0
i think that it looks good so im gonna buy it thats not all though also because i think it smells of shit luv sam xxxxx
- Reply
- 2004-11-28 11:37
- U
- morecleverthanyou
- Report
- 0
Apart from the new sony ericsson v800 which is also a 3g phone!!!!!!! And it DOESNT have an antenna. And it's probably one of the best out there.
- Reply
- 2004-11-25 17:34
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
To all those unknowns, first of all this is a 3G phone not a GSM phone so unless you want to buy those repulsive 3G candy bar Nokia phones that don’t qualify to be 3G phones since they don’t support video streaming then you have only two choices NEC and Motorola and none of those 2 companies have a clam shell phones without an antenna, well NEC has one but it’s as ugly as hell. So stop acting like ignorants and claiming that there’re better 3G phones out here. It’s true that nokia has the biggest market share, but when it comes to 3G Motorola is the leader, do some reading it might be helpful for you kids.
- Reply
- 2004-11-23 18:22
- U
- Nick Wells
- Report
- 0
Hi Jae,pls trust me the clarity of the phone is quite bad comparing to other's brand.Have check with my local service centre they said can upgrade the software but every thing inside will be erase so till now haven't do yet.
Regards
- Reply
- 2004-11-21 11:17
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Hi boys. Can anyone confirm that dis fone is gangster. I wanna buy it innit but i need to 3G call my hommies innit and show a bit of video of me macking hoes. innit
- Reply
- 2004-11-20 18:13
- U
- Lorus
- Report
- 0
Can anybody confirm if this phone has an infrared port? (There are sites that don't say anything about it)
- Reply
- 2004-11-19 18:00
- U
- Spike
- Report
- 0
If you bought something for £500 you would expect a good quality product.
This board is for peoples opinions, not for jumped up little twats like you to go mouthing off on. Tosser INNIT
- Reply
- 2004-11-19 17:23
- U
- XSO
- Report
- 0
everyone who is going "oh wah wah wah it's ugly oh wah wah wah it has an antenna wah wah wah it has a short battery life", shut up. it's only a phone.
- Reply
- 2004-11-19 17:13
- U
- Spike
- Report
- 0
He is right. When you consider what else is on the UK market at the mo why would you even consider this. Its like a fat minger walking into a room of supermodels, which one would you rather take home??!!
Its big, ugly and badly made. Reminds me of the toy phones at toysRus!
- Reply
- 2004-11-19 11:13
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Someone said why do you care about the antenna,its the features that count, but when you can get other phones with better features than this without antennas then why would you bother buying this, its lame
- Reply
- 2004-11-19 11:02
- U
- skater42
- Report
- 0
Most of you here are clueless...
This is NOT just a GSM phone... OK.
It's 3G hence the short battery life. 3G services take more out of your phone than standard 2/2.5G services. This phone is ugly...I agree. The features are OK, but the "hardware" is not up-to-date. The screen is too small and if it's the same as on the V525 etc... absolutely horrible.
I wouldn't get this phone unless I get it for free. But it's a 3G phone so if you want stylish phones you are in the wrong section.
- Reply
- 2004-11-13 11:17
- U
