Motorola VE75 - user opinions and reviews

Motorola

Popularity

Daily interest
0.5%
Total hits:
133542

Voting results

Design
6.4
Features
6.1
Performance
6.2
Votes:
378

Pages: 1234 5 6

This definitely not a copy of W595. It looks nothing like it. If anything it looks like the Siemens SL65.

Moto does not need to copy anybody. They set the trends for handset design.

How many companies ripped off the RAZR design??....that's what I thought.

SE still blows....Even as bad a situation Moto is in, it still beats SE in sales....LOL

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-30 02:14
  • 42pC
  • U

its just me or what. why so SE like?!?!

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-30 01:42
  • YgyX
  • C

is there a sense making phones such like this?

good display and dual sim, are the bright sides...

Weight & dimensions are... awful. Big, FAT & heavy moto-clone of SE design, some sort of nokia and samsung-style.

Motorola is dying and that fatboy is a very good example, the last days are similar to Siemens (no own style, crap phones, dumb phones, strange phones, clone phones)

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-30 01:31
  • mMFu
  • C

cool cool but no thanks

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-30 00:45
  • xK5X
  • U

nice design.. simple and clean.... should have been at least 14mm thin considering the specs...

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-30 00:30
  • 2AmD
  • U

Wow...extremely short battery life!

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-29 22:47
  • n6iV
  • U

this motorola 90% copy sony ericsson w595

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-29 22:46
  • mJU{
  • Q

nice design buttttt looks like the SE W760

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-29 22:24
  • Ycj%
  • U

motorola goes S.E style

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-29 21:58
  • P7@u
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-07-29 15:31 from mpbPYou seem 2 be responding 2 my post where I'm wishing if it had 3G, PDF viewer and a 3.5mm jack. The phone has been done injustice considering the big screen(2.6") and Linux OS(a computer OS). I think the things I need in that phone have become basic features in Samsung's and Nokia's these days, it's 2008 for heaven's sake. No insult intended.

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-29 21:13
  • p$Kx
  • R

this phone is very similar to sony ericsson w760

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-29 21:02
  • 0xGn
  • U

How comes this thickness without any feature?
20mm, omg. Disgusting.

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-29 20:55
  • n9GL
  • C

hey i like dis fone.

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-29 20:21
  • kcIt
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-07-29 20:14 from LEvbtrue!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-29 20:16
  • nwHh
  • R

> In reply to UNBELIEVABLE! @ 2008-07-29 19:41 from mX3qlooking like a 5200??? What are talking about???

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-29 20:15
  • nwHh
  • R

this is a new motorola design and if you say motorola copy designs is not true
nokia and samsung always copied motorola designs:
nokia n76 = the copy of the razr
samsung ultra = motorola slvr series
samsung g400 = another ugly copy of the razr
samsung L320 = the copy of the pebl
sony ericsson w580 = a copy of the rokr z6
...................

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-29 20:14
  • LEvb
  • U

all phones now progress only nokia late always nokia late

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-29 19:56
  • mJU{
  • F

i cant believe how much this looks like the nokia 5200 and sony ericsson w760!
cant they use their own designs?
oh... and its now at least 2mp on phones now!
goodbye motorola!
r.i.p!

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-29 19:41
  • mX3q
  • U

this is really cool. i really like it. it might hit europe/america market this year. and, yeah, it has a 2 megapixel camera and linux operational sistem. it's already available in china.

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-29 19:36
  • Ln7}
  • U

The highlight of this phone is Dual Sim. It appears to be a very nice, low-budget dual sim phone. The only thing I would like to see on it is a little better battery life and a Quad Band first sim and Dual Band second Sim.

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-29 17:07
  • 4mDc
  • C
Pages: 1234 5 6

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.