HTC Sensation XE review: The eXtended Edition
BlackBerry Bold 9900 review: Business reimaginedMotorola VE75 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.4
- Features
-
6.1
- Performance
-
6.1
- Greg
- Report
- 0
OMG!! Motorola should stop making phones, seriously!! Motorola is best known for their Tetra radios, trunking radios etc..., but cellphones? they should quit along time....
- Reply
- 2008-07-30 02:57
- Pvmr
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to nicksti @ 2008-07-29 17:07 from 4mDc - click to readAgree a quad band + dual band slots would be better than current dual tri-band design. True that not too many brands out there offer dual SIM slots, though with everything else being rather basic, the phone seems a bit expensive at around USD$500, being the official price from Moto China where the phone has officially released already.
I may get one when price drops below USD200
- Reply
- 2008-07-30 02:37
- Er2M
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
This definitely not a copy of W595. It looks nothing like it. If anything it looks like the Siemens SL65.
Moto does not need to copy anybody. They set the trends for handset design.
How many companies ripped off the RAZR design??....that's what I thought.
SE still blows....Even as bad a situation Moto is in, it still beats SE in sales....LOL
- Reply
- 2008-07-30 02:14
- 42pC
- U
- blq
- Report
- 0
is there a sense making phones such like this?
good display and dual sim, are the bright sides...
Weight & dimensions are... awful. Big, FAT & heavy moto-clone of SE design, some sort of nokia and samsung-style.
Motorola is dying and that fatboy is a very good example, the last days are similar to Siemens (no own style, crap phones, dumb phones, strange phones, clone phones)
- Reply
- 2008-07-30 01:31
- mMFu
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
nice design.. simple and clean.... should have been at least 14mm thin considering the specs...
- Reply
- 2008-07-30 00:30
- 2AmD
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-07-29 15:31 from mpbP - click to readYou seem 2 be responding 2 my post where I'm wishing if it had 3G, PDF viewer and a 3.5mm jack. The phone has been done injustice considering the big screen(2.6") and Linux OS(a computer OS). I think the things I need in that phone have become basic features in Samsung's and Nokia's these days, it's 2008 for heaven's sake. No insult intended.
- Reply
- 2008-07-29 21:13
- p$Kx
- R
- motorized
- Report
- 0
How comes this thickness without any feature?
20mm, omg. Disgusting.
- Reply
- 2008-07-29 20:55
- n9GL
- C
- rondo
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-07-29 20:14 from LEvb - click to readtrue!!!!!
- Reply
- 2008-07-29 20:16
- nwHh
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to UNBELIEVABLE! @ 2008-07-29 19:41 from mX3q - click to readlooking like a 5200??? What are talking about???
- Reply
- 2008-07-29 20:15
- nwHh
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
this is a new motorola design and if you say motorola copy designs is not true
nokia and samsung always copied motorola designs:
nokia n76 = the copy of the razr
samsung ultra = motorola slvr series
samsung g400 = another ugly copy of the razr
samsung L320 = the copy of the pebl
sony ericsson w580 = a copy of the rokr z6
...................
- Reply
- 2008-07-29 20:14
- LEvb
- U
